UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)

Filed by the Registrantx
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto¨
Check the appropriate box:
o¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
o¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a‑6(e)14a-6(e)(2))
xDefinitive Proxy Statement
o¨Definitive Additional Materials
o¨Soliciting Material under §240.14a‑12§240.14a-12

BROOKFIELD PROPERTY REIT INC.
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
xNo fee required.

o¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a‑6(i)14a-6(i)(1) and 0‑11.0-11.
 (1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 (2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 (3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0‑110-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 (4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 (5)

Total fee paid:

o¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0‑11(a)0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 (2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 (3)

Filing Party:

 (4)

Date Filed:











GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES,

BROOKFIELD PROPERTY REIT INC.

110 North Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606

250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor

New York, New York 10281-1023

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held MayJune 17, 2016

2020

To our Stockholders:

The 20162020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of General Growth Properties,Brookfield Property REIT Inc. (the “Company”) will be held on MayJune 17, 2016,2020, at 9:11:00 a.m. local time at our principal executive offices located at 110 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606.Eastern Time. The Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting conducted via live audio webcast that can be accessed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/bpyu2020. At the meeting our stockholders will consider the following items of business:

1.
To elect nineten directors to serve until the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

2.
To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the named executive officers;

3.
To ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016; and

4.To transact other business properly coming before the meeting.
Each of these matters is described in further detail in the attached proxy statement. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 18, 2016 are entitled to vote at the meeting or any postponement or adjournment of the meeting. A complete list of these stockholders will be available at our principal executive offices prior to the meeting.
We are pleased to take advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow us to furnish proxy materials to you on the Internet. These rules allow us to provide our stockholders with the information they need, while lowering the costs of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors,
Chicago, Illinois
April 1, 2016
Sandeep Mathrani
Chief Executive Officer



Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be held
on May 17, 2016

The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders and the means to vote by Internet are available at www.ProxyVote.com.
Your Vote Is Important
Please use this opportunity to take part in our governance by voting your shares. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please vote as promptly as possible in accordance with the instructions set forth in the attached proxy statement and related material.
Only persons with an admission ticket, evidence of stock ownership or who are guests of the Company may attend and be admitted to the meeting. Photo identification will be required, such as a valid driver’s license or passport.
If your shares are registered in your name, you must bring an admission ticket provided by us. Instructions regarding how to obtain an admission ticket are set forth in the attached proxy statement.

If your shares are registered in the name of a broker or other nominee, you will need to bring a proxy or a letter from that broker or other nominee or a recent brokerage account statement that confirms that you are the beneficial owner of those shares as of the record date.

If you do not have either an admission ticket or proof that you own shares, you will not be admitted to the meeting. No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags or packages will be permitted at the meeting.




Proxy Statement Summary
This summary highlights information contained in the proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
When?May 17, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Central Time
Where?110 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606
Who?Stockholders of Record on March 18, 2016

Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
ProposalsRecommendation
1.To elect nine directors to serve until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.FOR
2.To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the named executive officers.FOR
3.To ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016.FOR2020; and

3.
Casting Your Vote
Internet:
www.proxyvote.com until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 16, 2016.
Telephone:
1-800-690-6903 until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 16, 2016.
Mail:Mark, sign, date and return your proxy or voting instruction card.
In person:Request, complete and deposit a copy ofTo transact other business properly coming before the proxy card or complete a ballot at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.meeting.





Each of these matters is described in further detail in the proxy statement that accompanies this notice. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 22, 2020 are entitled to vote at the meeting or any postponement or adjournment of the meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 Page
1
1
2
6
6
6
6
6
7
8
Director Independence New York, New York
April 29, 2020
Michelle L. Campbell
Secretary

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page 

General Information3
About the Meeting4
Proposal 1 Election of Directors7
Proposal 2 Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm10
Corporate Governance11
11
14
14
14
15
Executive Officers16
17
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management18
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions1920
Report of the Audit Committee2124
Additional Information21
35
36
36
37
38
39
40
41
43
44
45
46
48
49
49
50
50
51
53
25



PROXY STATEMENT

BROOKFIELD PROPERTY REIT INC.

250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor

New York, New York 10281-1023

2020 PROXY STATEMENT

GENERAL INFORMATION

The Board of Directors (“Board”) of General Growth Properties,Brookfield Property REIT Inc. is asking for your proxy for use at the 2020 annual meeting of our stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on MayJune 17, 2016,2020, at 9:11:00 a.m. CentralEastern Time, at our principal executive offices located at 110 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois, and at any postponement or adjournment of the meeting. The Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting conducted via live audio webcast that can be accessed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/bpyu2020. We are making this proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) and related material available to our stockholders on or about April 1, 2016.29, 2020. In this Proxy Statement we refer to General Growth Properties,Brookfield Property REIT Inc. as “GGP,“BPYU,” “we,” “us,” “our”“our,” or the “Company”.

Stockholders are being asked to vote at the Annual Meeting on the following items of business:

(1)the election of ten directors to the Board;

(2)the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2020; and

(3)such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

This Proxy Statement summarizes the information you need to know in order to vote on these proposals in an informed manner.

Use of the Internet

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we sometimes referhave elected to provide access to our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, including this Proxy Statement and our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2019 on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”), on the Internet. Accordingly, on or about April 29, 2020, we will begin mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) to all of the Company’s stockholders of record and beneficial owners as of the record date for the Annual Meeting. The Notice will include instructions on how you may access the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting at www.proxyvote.com. Stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting unless they request them, in which case, printed copies of the proxy materials and a paper proxy card will be provided at no charge. Any stockholder may request to receive the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail by contacting us at bpy.enquiries@brookfield.com prior to June 3, 2020 in order to receive the materials in advance of the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to take advantage of the availability of the Company’s proxy materials on the Internet in order to lower our printing and delivery costs and help reduce the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting.

We have elected this year to hold the Annual Meeting virtually via the Internet. Stockholders who choose to attend the Annual Meeting will do so by accessing a live audio webcast of the Annual Meeting via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/bpyu2020. At this website, stockholders will be able to listen to the Annual Meeting live, submit questions and submit their vote while the Annual Meeting is being held. We believe hosting the Annual Meeting virtually will enable increased stockholder attendance from locations around the world and will encourage more active stockholder engagement and participation at the Annual Meeting. Please see “How do I attend the Annual Meeting?” below for more information.


ABOUT THE MEETING

Who is entitled to vote?

The Board has fixed the close of Directorsbusiness (Eastern Time) on April 22, 2020 (the “Record Date”), as the “Board.record date to determine who is entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.There were 57,336,992 shares ofClass A Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class A Stock”), 202,438,184 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series B Preferred Stock”), 175,180,348 shares ofClass B-1 Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class B-1 Stock”) and 640,051,301 shares ofClass C Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class C Stock”), outstanding on the Record Date, each entitled to one vote with respect to the election of each director nominee and one vote on the other proposal presented for stockholder action at the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any and all adjournments or postponements thereof.

How do I attend the Annual Meeting?

All stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date, or their designated proxies, may attend and participate in the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you are encouraged to vote on the Internet, by telephone or by mail before the Annual Meeting, to ensure that your vote will be counted. Please see “How do I vote my shares?

PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

and “Can I change my vote?” below for voting instructions.

To attend and participate in the Annual Meeting, stockholders will need to access the live audio webcast of the meeting. To do so, stockholders of record will need to visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/bpyu2020 and use their 16-digit control number provided in the Notice to login to this website, and beneficial owners of shares held in street name will need to follow the instructions provided by the broker, bank or other nominee that holds their shares. We encourage stockholders to login to this website and access the webcast before the Annual Meeting’s start time. Further instructions on how to attend, participate in and vote at the Annual Meeting, including how to demonstrate your ownership of our stock as of the record date, are available at www.proxyvote.com.

Submitting your proxy before the Annual Meeting will not affect your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you decide to attend; however, your attendance at the Annual Meeting after having submitted a valid proxy will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of your proxy. In order to do so, you must submit an online vote during the webcast of the Annual Meeting reflecting your new vote. Please see “Can I change my vote?” below for further detail.

What are the Board’s voting recommendations?

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends athat you vote

your shares FOR the election of each of the ninenominees to the Board (Proposal 1) and FOR the ratification of Directors’ nominees (Item 1the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2).

What matters are to be voted on at the Annual Meeting and what are the required votes?

Proposal 

Who is Entitled to Vote 

Voting Requirement 

Item 1:
Election of Each of the Nominees to the Board
Holders of the outstanding shares of Class A Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Class B-1 Stock and Class C Stock, voting together as a single class.

Majority of votes cast

Abstentions and broker non-votes excluded

The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the Director Nominees.

Item 2:
Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Holders of the outstanding shares of Class A Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Class B-1 Stock and Class C Stock, voting together as a single class.

Majority of the voting power present and entitled to vote thereon

Abstentions have the effect of an AGAINST VOTE and broker non-votes have no effect


The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal 2.

Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (“BPY”) has informed the Company that it intends to vote, or cause to be voted, the shares of Series B Preferred Stock, Class B-1 Stock and Class C Stock it owns, directly or indirectly, in favor of each of the Proposals. Because BPY owns, directly or indirectly, a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company and all of the outstanding shares of the Series B Preferred Stock, Class B-1 Stock and Class C Stock, it has the power to approve each Proposal.

How do I vote my shares?

Stockholders of Record. If you are a “record” holder of our shares (that is, if you hold your stock in your own name in the Company’s stock records maintained by our transfer agent), you may vote in any one of the following ways:

On the Internet.You may vote on the Internet in one of two ways: (1) you may vote by proxy before the Annual Meeting starts by visiting www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions in the Notice; or (2) you may vote during the Annual Meeting by attending the live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/bpyu2020 and following the instructions in the Notice.

By Telephone.If you request printed copies of the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, you may vote by proxy by calling the toll-free number found on the proxy card delivered with these proxy materials.

By Mail.If you request printed copies of the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, you may vote by proxy by completing the proxy card delivered with these proxy materials and mailing it in the envelope provided.

Votes submitted by proxy on the Proxy Card).

OurInternet or by telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the day before the Annual Meeting to be counted. Votes submitted on the Internet during the Annual Meeting by stockholders attending the Annual Meeting and votes submitted by mail must be received no later than the close of voting at the Annual Meeting to be counted.

Beneficial Owners of Shares Held in Street Name. If you hold shares of our Company in “street name” (that is, through a broker, bank or other nominee), you will need to obtain a voting instruction form from the institution that holds your shares and follow the voting instructions and submission deadlines on that form. The availability of Internet, telephone, mail or other methods to vote your shares by proxy will depend on the voting processes of the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares.

What happens if I don’t provide voting instructions?

Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record at the close of business on the Record Date and you submit a valid proxy that does not provide voting instructions with respect to your shares, all shares represented by your proxy will be voted FOR the election of each of the nominees to the Board (Proposal 1) and FOR the ratification of Directorsthe independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2).

Beneficial Owners of Shares Held in Street Name. If you hold shares of our Company in “street name” it is currently comprisedimportant that you provide the broker, bank or other nominee who holds your shares with voting instructions on the matters to be voted on at the meeting. With respect to the election of nine members. each of the nominees to the Board (Proposal 1), your broker or other institution generally will not be able to vote your shares unless you provide voting instructions. With respect to the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2), your broker or other nominee in certain circumstances may be able to vote your shares in its discretion without voting instructions from you.

Can I change my vote?

Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record at the close of business on the Record Date, you may revoke a previously submitted proxy and change your vote by taking any one of the following actions:

Later-Dated Vote.You may revoke a previously submitted proxy by submitting a later-dated vote on the Internet (either before or during the Annual Meeting), by telephone or by mail.

Written Notice.You may revoke a previously submitted proxy by sending or otherwise delivering a written notice of revocation to the attention of our Secretary at the address of our principal executive offices.


To be effective, any later-dated vote must be received by the applicable deadline for the voting method used, as described above, and any written notice of revocation must be received no later than the close of voting at the Annual Meeting. Only your latest-dated vote that is received by the deadline applicable to the voting method used will be counted.

Beneficial Owners of Shares Held in Street Name. If you hold our shares in “street name,” you will need to contact the institution that holds your shares and follow its instructions for revoking your proxy.

How will the proxy holders vote?

The persons named in the accompanying proxy intend to vote the shares represented by all properly executed and unrevoked proxies received by them in accordance with the instructions on each proxy. If no instructions are given, they will vote FOR the election of each of the nominees to the Board (Proposal 1) and FOR the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2). If any other matters come before the Annual Meeting, your proxy grants the individuals named in the proxy the discretion to vote on such matters.

What constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting?

If a majority of the voting power of the Company’s capital stock entitled to vote generally on the election of directors on the Record Date are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, we will have a quorum, permitting the conduct of business at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, we had 57,336,992 shares of Class A Stock, 202,438,184 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, 175,180,348 shares of Class B-1 Stock and 640,051,301 shares of Class C Stock outstanding and entitled to vote on the election of directors. When specified business is to be voted on by one or more classes or series of stock voting separately, the holders of the majority of the shares of such class or classes or series shall constitute a quorum of such class or classes or series for the transaction of such business. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present in person or represented by proxy for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.

Who will bear the costs of soliciting votes for the meeting?

Your proxy is being solicited by the Board on behalf of the Company. The Company will bear the entire cost of the solicitation of proxies from its stockholders. Solicitations will be made primarily through the Notice and the solicitation materials made available on the Internet or via e-mail or in print to those who request copies, but may be supplemented by telephone, mail, e-mail or personal solicitation by our directors or officers, who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation activities. We will provide copies of solicitation materials to brokers, banks and other nominees holding in their names shares of our stock that are beneficially owned by others for forwarding to the beneficial owners of those shares who have requested printed materials and we will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to our stockholders.


PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Each of the Company’s directors serves for a one‑yearone-year term and is subject to annual election by the stockholders. Accordingly, the stockholders will be asked to elect nineten directors at the Annual Meeting. Each director will hold office until the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, in 2017, and until a successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.

The Board, of Directors, based on the recommendation of the NominatingGovernance and GovernanceNominating Committee, has nominated the persons set forth below for a term of office commencingCaroline M. Atkinson, Jeffrey M. Blidner, Soon Young Chang, Richard B. Clark, Omar Carneiro da Cunha, Scott R. Cutler, Stephen DeNardo, Louis J. Maroun, A. Douglas McGregor and Lars Rodert to be elected to serve on the date of this year’s Annual Meeting and ending onBoard, each until the date of the2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2017, and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignationsuccessor is duly elected and qualified.

Each of the nominees is currently a director of our Company and has agreed to stand for election, be named in this Proxy Statement and to serve on the Board if elected. If, prior to the Annual Meeting, a nominee should become unavailable to serve, the shares represented by a properly executed and returned proxy will be voted for such additional person as shall be designated by the Board, unless the Board determines to reduce the number of directors or removal.to leave a vacant seat on the Board in accordance with the Company’s Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Charter”) and Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), as then in effect. During the course of a term, the Board may appoint a new director to fill any vacant seat. In that event, the newly appointed director would complete the term of the director he or she replaced or, if appointed to fill a vacancy caused by an increase to the size of the Board, serve until the next annual meeting of our stockholders.

Director Nominees

The nominees for the Board are set forth below, along with a description of their professional backgrounds. Each of these personsdirector nominees currently serves on the Board of the general partner of our parent company, BPY, (the “BPY General Partner”). We believe each of these nominees contributes to the Board’s effectiveness as a whole based on the wealth of executive leadership experience they bring to the Board, as well as the other specific attributes, qualifications and skills described below. All nominees have agreed to serve if elected.

Caroline M. Atkinson, 67Director since February 2019

Ms. Atkinson is a Senior Adviser to RockCreek, an investment firm in Washington D.C., a trustee of the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London and a director of the BPY General Partner. Ms. Atkinson is an Oxford-trained economist with more than two decades of experience as a senior policymaker in international economics and finance and as an executive in technology. She has held senior positions at Alphabet Inc. (“Google”), the U.S. government, The International Monetary Fund and The Bank of England. Most recently, Ms. Atkinson was Head of Global Policy for Google. Prior to joining Google, Ms. Atkinson worked for President Barack Obama as the Deputy National Security Adviser for International Economics at the White House. She was the President’s personal representative to major international economic summits, including the G-7/8 and the G-20. She was also the Advisor to Treasury Secretaries, Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers. She has advised leading U.S. companies on global business and economic issues. Ms. Atkinson is a Member of the Board Executive Committee for the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and a Member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Economic Club of New York. The Board nominated Ms. Atkinson to serve as a director based, among other factors, on her experience in international economics and finance.

Jeffrey M. Blidner, 71Director since August 2018

Mr. Blidner is Vice Chairman of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (“Brookfield Asset Management”) and is responsible for strategic planning and fundraising. Mr. Blidner is also the Chief Executive Officer of Brookfield Asset Management’s Private Funds Group, Chairman and a director of the general partner of each of Brookfield Business Partners L.P. and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and a director of Brookfield Asset Management, the BPY General Partner and the general partner of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. Mr. Blidner also served as a board member for Rouse Properties, Inc. from 2012 to 2016. Prior to joining Brookfield Asset Management in 2000, Mr. Blidner was a senior partner at a Canadian law firm. The Board nominated Mr. Blidner to serve as a director based, among other factors, on his knowledge of the Company and his experience in board governance.


Dr. Soon Young Chang, 60Director since August 2018

Dr. Chang is a member of the Board.

board of directors of Dubai World and the BPY General Partner. Dr. Chang serves as Senior Advisor to the Investment Corporation of Dubai, providing strategic counsel and lending his global perspective to the investment arm of the Dubai Government. Dr. Chang is the founder and chairman of Midas International Asset Management Company, an international asset management fund which manages over $5 billion. He is also a founding partner of Sentinel Advisor, a New York-based arbitrage fund. Dr. Chang has served as an advisor to a variety of financial institutions, including Korea National Pension Corporation, Hyundai International Merchant Bank and Templeton-Ssangyong Investment Trust Company. Dr. Chang received his Master’s and Doctoral degrees from George Washington University and has authored many books and articles on the subject of financial engineering. The Board nominated Dr. Chang to serve as a director based, among other factors, on his knowledge of the Company and his experience in asset management and international finance.

Richard B. Clark, 61Director since August 2018

Mr. Clark is a Managing Partner of Brookfield Asset Management and Chairman of the board of directors of the Company and the BPY General Partner. He has over 30 years of real estate experience. Mr. Clark has been employed by Brookfield Asset Management and its predecessors since 1984 in various senior roles including President and Chief Executive Officer of Brookfield Property Group LLC (“BPG”) and BPY. Mr. Clark holds a Bachelor of Science in Business from the Indiana University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Clark served on the board of directors of GGP Inc. (“GGP”) prior to its acquisition by BPY. The Board nominated Mr. Clark to serve as a director based, among other factors, on his knowledge of the Company and his experience in commercial real estate and development.

Omar Carneiro da Cunha, 73Director since August 2018

Mr. Cunha is a Senior Partner with Dealmaker Ltd., a consultancy and M&A advisory firm, with a focus in telecommunications, information technology, oil & gas and retail, and has also been a Senior Partner of BOND Consultoria Empresarial e Participacoes since 1994. Mr. Cunha is a director of the BPY General Partner. He was the Chairman of “Bob’s”, a Brazilian fast food company, from 1995 to 2008, a director of the Energisa Group since 1996, and a director of Grupo Libra from 2010 to 2019. In 2005, Mr. Cunha was the Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of VARIG Brazilian Airline. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Cunha was the President of AT&T Brasil and a member of the Management Committee of AT&T International. Prior to that, Mr. Cunha worked for 27 years in Brazil and abroad for the Royal Dutch/Shell Group, and was President of Shell Brasil, Billiton Metals and Shell Quimica from 1991 to 1994. Mr. Cunha is currently a member of the American Chamber of Commerce for Brazil. The Board nominated Mr. Cunha to serve as a director based, among other factors, on his knowledge of the Company and his experience in board governance in the telecommunications, technology, energy and retail sectors.

Scott R. Cutler, 50Director since February 2019

Mr. Cutler is the Chief Executive Officer of StockX, a private consumer e-commerce marketplace, and a director of the BPY General Partner. He previously was the Senior Vice President, Americas at eBay from 2017 to 2019, where he oversaw the Americas business unit, including the United States, Latin America, and Canada. Mr. Cutler joined eBay Inc. as President of eBay’s StubHub business in April 2015 after nine years as an Executive Vice President at the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). During his tenure at NYSE, Mr. Cutler transformed it into the number one global exchange and was responsible for over $1 trillion in capital raised and helped to take public some of the world’s most iconic brands of the last decade. Mr. Cutler holds a B.S. degree in Economics from Brigham Young University (“BYU”) and a J.D. from the University of California, Hasting College of Law. He also serves on the board of Vibrant Emotional Health and is a trustee on the National Advisory Committee for BYU, his alma mater. The Board nominated Mr. Cutler to serve as a director based, among other factors, on his experience in technology and international business.

Stephen DeNardo, 66Director since August 2018

Mr. DeNardo is currently managing director and president and Chief Executive Officer of RiverOak Investment Corp., LLC and has held this position since 1999. He is also a director of the BPY General Partner and Chairman of its Audit Committee. From 1997 to 1999 he was Partner and Senior Vice President of ING Realty Partners, where he managed a $1 billion portfolio. Prior to his employment with ING Realty Partners, he was President of ARES Realty Capital from 1991 to 1997, where he managed a $5 billion portfolio of diversified debt and equity assets. Before joining ARES Realty Capital, he was a Partner at First Winthrop Corporation. Mr. DeNardo has held a license as a Certified Public Accountant since 1978 and is a Chartered Global Management Accountant. He has a B.S. in Accounting from Fairleigh Dickinson University. The Board nominated Mr. DeNardo to serve as a director based, among other factors, on his knowledge of the Company, his financial acumen and his experience in commercial real estate and asset management.


Louis J. Maroun, 69Director since August 2018

Mr. Maroun is the Founder and Chairman of Sigma Real Estate Advisors and Sigma Capital Corporation, which specializes in international real estate advisory services. Prior to this role, Mr. Maroun was the Executive Chairman of ING Real Estate Canada and held executive positions in a number of real estate companies where he was responsible for overseeing operations, real estate transactions, asset and property management, as well as many other related functions. Mr. Maroun is a director of the BPY General Partner and Chair of its Governance and Nominating Committee. Mr. Maroun also is on the board of directors of the general partner of Brookfield Renewable Energy Partners L.P. and Summit Industrial Income REIT. Previously, Mr. Maroun served on the board of ThermoCeramix Corp. from 2014 to 2016. Mr. Maroun graduated from the University of New Brunswick in 1972 with a Bachelor’s degree, followed by a series of post graduate studies and in January of 2007, after a long and successful career in investment real estate, Mr. Maroun was elected to the position of Fellow of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors The Board nominated Mr. Maroun to serve as a director based, among other factors, on his knowledge of the Company and his experience in commercial real estate and board governance.

A. Douglas McGregor, 63Director since March 2020

Mr. McGregor was the Group Head of RBC Capital Markets and RBC Investor & Treasury Services, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of RBC Capital Markets, and was a member of RBC’s Group Executive until his retirement in January 2020. He is also a director of the BPY General Partner. Mr. McGregor joined RBC in 1983 and held progressively senior roles at the bank, becoming Capital Markets Chief Executive Officer in 2008 and assuming responsibility for Investor & Treasury Services in 2012. As Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of RBC Capital Markets, Mr. McGregor had global oversight of the firm’s Corporate & Investment Banking and Global Markets activities conducted by its approximately 7,500 employees worldwide. He also directly led the investment bank’s real estate lending businesses. As Group Head of RBC Investor & Treasury Services, Mr. McGregor was responsible for this business’ custody, treasury and financing services for institutional clients globally. Mr. McGregor holds an Honours B.A. (Business) and an MBA from the University of Western Ontario. Mr. McGregor serves on the University Health Network’s Board of Trustees in Toronto and is a former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada. The Board nominated Mr. McGregor to serve as a director based, among other factors, on his experience in commercial real estate, asset management and international finance.

Lars Rodert, 58Director since August 2018

Mr. Rodert is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of ÖstVäst Capital Management (“OVCM”) and is a director of the BPY General Partner and its Lead Independent Director. Mr. Rodert has 30 years of experience in global investment industry. Prior to OVCM, Mr. Rodert spent 11 years as a Global Investment Manager for IKEA Treasury. Before joining IKEA, Mr. Rodert was with SEB Asset Management for 10 years as Chief Investment Officer and responsible for SEB Global Funds (“SEB”). Prior to SEB, Mr. Rodert spent 10 years in North America with five years at Investment Bank Gordon Capital and five years as a partner with a private investment holding company, Robur et. Securitas. Mr. Rodert is a director of PCCW Limited, an information and communications technology company. Mr. Rodert holds a Master of Science Degree in Business and Economics from Stockholm University. The Board nominated Mr. Rodert to serve as a director based, among other factors, on his knowledge of the Company and his experience in commercial real estate and board governance.

Election of Directors

To be elected, the votes cast in favor of the election of a nominee must exceed the votes cast against the election of that nominee. The holders of our Class A Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Class B-1 Stock and Class C Stock, voting together as a single class, are entitled to vote on the election of directors. Under Delaware law, if an incumbent director is not re-elected, the director will continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” If any incumbent director is not re-elected, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Bylaws, the director is required to tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Board. The Chairman of the Board will review any submitted resignation and the Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the resignation, evaluating the best interest of the Company and its stockholders, and make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE

FOR EACH OF THE TEN DIRECTOR NOMINEES (ITEM 1 ON THE PROXY CARD).


PROPOSAL 2

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We are asking our stockholders to ratify the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. Deloitte has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 through 2019.

Although ratification by stockholders is not required by our organizational documents or other applicable law, the Audit Committee has determined that a policy of requesting ratification by stockholders of its selection of an independent registered public accounting firm is a matter of good corporate practice. If stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee may reconsider the selection of Deloitte. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. A representative of Deloitte is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services

The following table presents the fees paid by the Company to Deloitte during the periods presented:

Year Ended December 31, 

 

2019

  

2018 

 
Audit Fees(1) $3,155,600  $3,395,100 
Audit-Related Fees(2) $3,000,378  $2,482,800 
Tax Fees(3) $32,130  $84,700 
All Other Fees $  $ 
Total $6,188,108  $5,962,600 

(1)Audit fees consisted principally of the audits of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements, internal control over financial reporting, reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letters, and reviews of other filings or registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

(2)Audit-related fees consisted primarily of various audits of individual or portfolios of properties to comply with lender, joint venture partner or tenant requirements. The 2019 and 2018 fees exclude $256,600 and $224,000, respectively, related to consents provided for the 2018 and 2017 consolidated financial statements of the Company included in registration statements of BPY and its affiliates; all such fees were reimbursed by BPY.

(3)Tax services consisted principally of services necessitated by the Company’s ongoing tax compliance requirements.

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

We have adopted written policies that provide that the Audit Committee is to pre-approve all audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed for us by our independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with applicable law. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, all audit and non-audit services provided to us by Deloitte were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ratification of this Proposal 2 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of our Class A Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Class B-1 Stock and Class C Stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this Proposal 2, voting together as a single class.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE

FOR THIS PROPOSAL (ITEM 2 ON THE PROXY CARD).


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Nomination Process


BPYU, BPY, the BPY General Partner and BP US REIT LLC (“BPUS”), entered into a joint governance agreement, dated August 28, 2018 (the “Joint Governance Agreement”), intended to facilitate the governance of BPYU and BPY following the acquisition of all of the shares of common stock of GGP that BPY and its affiliates did not already own through a series of transactions (the “BPY Transaction”).

Pursuant to the Joint Governance Agreement, BPUS has the right to designate candidates to be nominated for election to each directorship subject to election at any meeting of BPYU stockholders and BPYU will include such nominees in its proxy statements without BPUS having to comply with the generally applicable provisions of the Company’s Bylaws regarding notice of stockholder nominations. The NominatingJoint Governance Agreement further provides that BPYU and the BPY General Partner will nominate an identical board of directors, except in limited circumstances. The nominees for the Board included in this Proxy Statement are also members of the board of directors of the BPY General Partner.

Additionally, each of the BPY General Partner and BPYU have the right to expand its respective board of directors to add additional non-overlapping independent members if it determines that the addition of non-overlapping board members is necessary to address or otherwise resolve a conflict of interest arising from its relationship with the other entity. Further, BPUS has the option, in its sole discretion, to cause each of the BPY General Partner and BPYU to expand the size of their respective boards, and to nominate one or more additional independent directors to fill the directorship created by such expansion.

The Company’s Governance and Nominating Committee annually selects candidates that it recommends to the Board of Directors to be director nominees of the Board for election by the stockholders as directors.stockholders. In addition, the Governance and Nominating and Governance Committee also selects candidates that it recommends to the Board for election as directors to fill vacancies.vacancies on the Board. In each case, the selection of candidates by the Governance and Nominating Committee is subject to the nomination rights of BPUS pursuant to the Joint Governance Agreement. The NominatingGovernance and GovernanceNominating Committee reviews with the Board, on an annual basis, the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of director nominees.


The Nominating andnominees, including those designated pursuant to the Joint Governance Committee considers many factors in identifying and recommending nominees for positions on the Board.Agreement. This assessment includes independence, as well as consideration ofnumerous other factors, including:

Integrity
Objectivity
Judgment
Leadership
Age
Skills
Experience
Abilityincluding ability to devote adequate time to Board duties,

experience and background.

Director nominees must possess appropriate qualifications and reflect a reasonable diversity of personal experience and background to promote ourthe Company’s strategic objectives, contribute to the development of strategic alliances and activities in which we have an indirect interest and to fulfill responsibilities as directors to our stockholders. In considering candidates, the NominatingGovernance and GovernanceNominating Committee considers the background and qualifications of the directors as a group, and whether the candidates and existing directors together will provide an appropriate mix of experience, knowledge and attributes that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. The NominatingGovernance and GovernanceNominating Committee and the Board do not have a formal diversity policy; however, in identifying nominees for director, the NominatingGovernance and GovernanceNominating Committee considers a diversity of professional experiences, perspectives, education, and backgrounds among the directors to ensure that a variety of perspectives are represented in Board discussions and deliberations concerning our business.



1


The Company’s Governance and Nominating Committee will also consider candidates recommended for nomination to the Board by our stockholders. Stockholder recommendations for nominees to the Board should be submitted in writing to our Secretary as set forth below under “—Manner by Which Stockholders May Nominate Director Candidates for Election at the Next Annual Meeting”.

The Governance and GovernanceNominating Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees. The NominatingGovernance and GovernanceNominating Committee does not set specific minimum qualifications that candidates must meet in order for it to recommend them to the Board, but rather believes that each candidate should be evaluated based on his or her merits, taking into account the needs of the Company and the composition of the Board as a whole.


The Nominating and Governance Committee uses

Manner by Which Stockholders May Nominate Director Candidates for Election at the same criteria to evaluate director candidates designated by Brookfield pursuant to the Investment Agreement as it uses for all other candidates. See “Investment Agreement with Brookfield” for a description of such designation rights.


In identifying potential candidates for Board membership, the Nominating and Governance Committee relies on suggestions and recommendations from members of the Board, management, stockholders and others. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by stockholders, and those candidates will be evaluated in the same manner as other candidates. The Nominating and Governance Committee assesses which candidates appear to best fit the needs of the Board and the Company and interviews and evaluates those candidates. Candidates selected by the Nominating and Governance Committee are recommended to the full Board of Directors. After the Board of Directors has approved a candidate (other than those designated pursuant to the Investment Agreement), the Board determines how to extend an invitation to join the Board.

Next Annual Meeting

Stockholders who wish to submit nominations for director for consideration by the NominatingGovernance and GovernanceNominating Committee for election at the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders may do so by delivering written notice, along with the additional information and materials required by our Bylaws, to our Corporate Secretary not later than 90 days nor earlier than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of this year’s annual meeting. As specified in our Bylaws, different notice deadlines apply in the case of a special meeting, when the date of an annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after the first anniversary of the prior year’s meeting, or when the first public announcement of the date of an annual meeting is less than 100 days prior to the date of such annual meeting. Accordingly, for the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we must receive this notice on or after JanuaryFebruary 17, 2017,2021 and on or before February 16, 2017.March 19, 2021. Such information must be addressed to our Corporate Secretary, c/o General Growth Properties,Brookfield Property REIT Inc., 110 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606‑1511.

250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10281-1023.


In the future, the Nominating and Governance Committee may choose to use outside consultants to help identify potential candidates and has sole authority to retain such outside consultants for this purpose.

Board of Directors and Nominees

The current members of our Board of Directors are set forth below, along with a description of their business experience, directorships during the past five years, and qualifications, attributes and skills. Each of the members of our Board of Directors is standing for re‑election as a nominee of the Board and has agreed to serve if elected.
Richard B. Clark, 57Director since November 2010
Mr. Clark is a Senior Managing Partner of Brookfield and the Chairman of Brookfield Property Group. Mr. Clark was formerly Chief Executive Officer of Brookfield Property Group, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Brookfield Office Properties, and, prior to that, was the President of Brookfield Office Properties’ U.S. commercial operations. Mr. Clark has been employed with Brookfield Property Group and its predecessors since 1984 in various executive roles. Mr. Clark holds a business degree from the Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
Mr. Clark's extensive experience in private equity, particularly in the real estate industry, allows him to make key contributions to our Board of Directors on investment and other strategy matters. Mr. Clark is a Brookfield Designee pursuant to the terms described under "Investment Agreement with Brookfield" and, as a Senior Managing Partner of Brookfield and the Chairman of Brookfield Property Group, may be deemed to have control over certain shares and warrants of GGP held by Brookfield entities, as described in the footnotes to the "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" table on page 46.


2


Mary Lou Fiala, 64Director since November 2010
Ms. Fiala is the Co‑Chairman of LOFT Unlimited, a personal financial and business consulting firm in Jacksonville, Florida. Ms. Fiala served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Regency Centers Corporation (“Regency”), a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) specializing in the ownership and operation of grocery anchored shopping centers, from January 1999 to December 2008. She was named Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer in January 2009, a position she served in until December 2009. In her role as Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer, Ms. Fiala was responsible for the operational management of Regency’s retail centers nationwide. She is a member of the Board of Directors of Regency. She is also Non-Executive Chairman of Build‑A‑Bear Workshop, Inc. Ms. Fiala also served as the 2008‑2009 Chairman of the International Council of Shopping Centers (“ICSC”). Ms. Fiala earned a bachelor’s degree in science from Miami University.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
Ms. Fiala has extensive operational experience in the retail industry, which brings the perspective of our tenants to our Board of Directors. Prior to working with Regency, Ms. Fiala served as Managing Director of Security Capital Global Strategic Group Incorporated, where she was responsible for the development of operating systems for the firm’s retail‑related initiatives. Previously, she also served as Senior Vice President and Director of Stores for Macy’s East/Federated Department Stores, where she was responsible for 19 Macy’s stores in five states, generating more than $1 billion in sales volume. Before her tenure at Macy’s, Ms. Fiala was Senior Vice President of Henri Bendel and Senior Vice President and Regional Director of stores for Federated’s Burdine’s Division. Her prior leadership roles allow her to provide to our Board of Directors insight on management and operational initiatives.
J. Bruce Flatt, 50Director since November 2010
Mr. Flatt is the Chairman of the Board of GGP. Mr. Flatt has been Chief Executive Officer of Brookfield since February 2002 after joining Brookfield in 1990. Mr. Flatt serves as a director of Brookfield. Mr. Flatt holds a business degree from the University of Manitoba.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
Mr. Flatt has been instrumental in the global expansion of the asset management business of Brookfield throughout the last twenty-five years. In this capacity, Mr. Flatt has served on over 15 public company boards, acting as chairman of a number of them. Mr. Flatt’s extensive experience in serving on the boards of public companies gives him valuable insight into the operations of public companies, and his long‑time experience at Brookfield, particularly in property operations, provides him with expertise that benefits our Board of Directors. Mr. Flatt is a Brookfield Designee pursuant to the terms described under “Investment Agreement with Brookfield” and, as the CEO and a Senior Managing Partner of Brookfield, may be deemed to have control over certain shares and warrants of GGP held by Brookfield entities, as described in the footnotes to the “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” table on page 46.
John K. Haley, 65Director since September 2009
Mr. Haley was a partner at Ernst & Young LLP in Transaction Advisory Services from 1998 until 2009 and led the Transaction Advisory Services practice in Boston, Massachusetts. Prior to that, he was an Audit Partner at Ernst & Young LLP from 1988 until 1997, where he served as audit partner on a variety of public and private companies. Mr. Haley is a member of the board of directors and chair of the audit committee of Amplify Snack Brands, Inc. Mr. Haley is also a member of the board of directors of Truck Hero, Inc. Mr. Haley holds a degree in accounting from Northeastern University and has completed executive programs at Harvard Business School, Northwestern University and Babson College.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
Mr. Haley has financial expertise and significant experience in SEC registrations, restructurings, special investigations and forensic investigations. Mr. Haley has given expert testimony on financial and accounting matters, and has experience in the real estate and retail industries. Mr. Haley was a member of the American Society of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Haley’s extensive professional accounting and financial experience, including with respect to public company requirements and SEC registrations, allow him to provide key contributions to the Board of Directors on financial, accounting and corporate governance matters.

3


Daniel B. Hurwitz, 52Director since August 2013
Mr. Hurwitz serves as interim CEO of Brixmor Property Group, Inc., a position he assumed in February 2016. Mr. Hurwitz is the Founder of Raider Hill Advisors, LLC and has served as its Chief Executive Officer since February 2015. Prior to founding Raider Hill, Mr. Hurwitz was Chief Executive Officer of DDR Corp. (“DDR”), from January 2010 to December 2014. Mr. Hurwitz was also a director of DDR from June 2009 to December 2014. DDR is an owner and manager of value‑oriented shopping centers. Mr. Hurwitz is a graduate of Colgate University and the Wharton School of Business Management Program at the University of Pennsylvania.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
Mr. Hurwitz has extensive retail real estate industry experience. His leadership of DDR, his prior experience as a member of senior management of companies in the retail industry, and his prior role as a member of the Board of Trustees of CubeSmart, for which he served as a member of the audit committee and chairman of the executive compensation committee, make him an invaluable member of our Board. Mr. Hurwitz is also very active in many cultural, charitable and academic institutions, which provide an important diversity of perspective and link between our Board and the community.
Brian W. Kingston, 42Director since August 2013
Mr. Kingston is currently a Senior Managing Partner of Brookfield and is the Chief Executive Officer of Brookfield Property Group, a position he assumed in November 2015. Mr. Kingston joined Brookfield in 2001 and held senior management positions within Brookfield and its affiliates, including mergers and acquisitions, merchant banking and real estate advisory services. From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Kingston held leadership roles for Brookfield in Australia, where Brookfield acquired and integrated property and infrastructure businesses. Mr. Kingston holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from Queens University.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
Mr. Kingston has extensive experience in the private equity and real estate industries, which allows him to make key contributions to our Board of Directors on investment and other strategic matters. Mr. Kingston is a Brookfield Designee pursuant to the terms described under "Investment Agreement with Brookfield" and, as a Senior Managing Partner of Brookfield and Chief Executive Officer of Brookfield Property Group, may be deemed to have control over certain shares and warrants of GGP held by Brookfield entities, as described in the footnotes to the "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" table on page 46.
Sandeep Mathrani, 53Director since January 2011
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Mathrani was the President of Retail for Vornado Realty Trust ("Vornado"). Mr. Mathrani is a Trustee of ICSC, an Executive Board member and Treasurer of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") and a member of The Real Estate Roundtable. Mr. Mathrani holds a Master of Engineering, Master of Management Science, and Bachelor of Engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
A real estate industry veteran with over 20 years of experience, Mr. Mathrani joined Vornado Realty Trust in February 2002, where he oversaw U.S. retail real estate and its India operations. Prior to Vornado, Mr. Mathrani spent eight years with Forest City Ratner, where he was Executive Vice President, responsible for that company's retail development and related leasing in the New York City metropolitan area. Mr. Mathrani's leadership role with the Company as well as his prior leadership roles at other real estate companies provide him with key experience in business and in the real estate industry and contribute to his ability to make strategic decisions with respect to our business. In addition, his in-depth knowledge of our business strategy and operations due to his role as our Chief Executive Officer enable him to provide valuable contributions and facilitate effective communication between management and the Board.
David J. Neithercut, 60Director since November 2010
Mr. Neithercut is the President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Trustees of Equity Residential (NYSE:EQR), a REIT focused on the acquisition, development and management of apartment properties in various U.S. markets. Mr. Neithercut has been the President of Equity Residential since May 2005 and became Chief Executive Officer and a trustee of Equity Residential in January 2006. Mr. Neithercut joined Equity Residential in 1995 as the company’s Chief Financial Officer and served in that capacity until August 2004 when he was named Executive Vice President—Corporate Strategy. Prior to joining Equity Residential, Mr. Neithercut was Senior Vice President of Finance for Equity Group Investments, an affiliate of Equity Residential’s predecessor company. Mr. Neithercut is a member of the Executive Board of NAREIT of which he served as Chairman in 2015. He also serves on the Policy Advisory Board of the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University and the MBA Real Estate Program Advisory Board at Columbia University. Mr. Neithercut holds a bachelor’s degree from St. Lawrence University and an M.B.A. from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
Mr. Neithercut’s leadership experience in working with residential REITs, as well as his membership in industry committees, provides our Board with valuable insight and knowledge into REIT operations and strategy and the REIT industry in general.

4


Mark R. Patterson, 55Director since July 2011
Mr. Patterson is the Chairman of Boomerang Systems, Inc. (“Boomerang”), a manufacturer of automated robotic parking and storage systems. Mr. Patterson was also the Chief Executive Officer of Boomerang until January 2015. In August 2015, Boomerang filed a petition for voluntary reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy. Until January 2009, Mr. Patterson was the Managing Director and Head of Real Estate Global Principal Investments of Merrill Lynch where he oversaw the principal investing activities of the firm. Mr. Patterson joined Merrill Lynch in April 2005, as the Global Head of Real Estate Investment Banking and in 2006 also became the Co‑Head of Global Commercial Real Estate which encompassed real estate investment banking, principal investing and mortgage debt. Prior to joining Merrill Lynch, Mr. Patterson spent 16 years at Citigroup where he was the Global Head of Real Estate Investment Banking since 1996. Previously, Mr. Patterson was with Chemical Realty Trust in New York from 1987 to 1989 as an Associate in the Real Estate Investment Banking Group. He was an auditor of real estate companies in the Real Estate Division of Arthur Anderson and Co. in Houston, Texas from 1982 to 1985. Mr. Patterson joined the Board of Directors of UDR, Inc. in January 2014 and serves as a member of its Audit and Risk Management Committee and the Governance Committee. Mr. Patterson holds a B.A. from the College of William and Mary and an M.B.A. from the Darden School of Business at the University of Virginia.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
Mr. Patterson has been involved in a wide range of advisory assignments, initial public offerings and financings that have spanned virtually all property types. Many of these transactions are notable because they were some of the largest of their type or represented new financing trends in global real estate finance. Although based in the United States, Mr. Patterson has had extensive global experience overseeing both Merrill Lynch’s and Citigroup’s real estate activities worldwide. Mr. Patterson is also a Certified Public Accountant.


5


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Meetings and Attendance


At the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Caroline M. Atkinson, Jeffrey M. Blidner, Dr. Soon Young Chang, Richard B. Clark, Omar Carneiro da Cunha, Scott R. Cutler, Stephen DeNardo, Louis J. Maroun and Lars Rodert were elected to the Board. A. Douglas McGregor was appointed to the Board in March 2020 pursuant to the Joint Governance Agreement (as further discussed under “—Director Nomination Process”). Consequently, the Board is currently comprised of ten members.

The Board of Directors of GGPand its committees meet quarterly on a set schedule and also hold special meetings from time to time. In 2019, the Board held eightfour meetings during 2015. Eachand its Audit Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee each held four meetings. Of the nine directors serving on the Board in 2019, (i) seven attended 100% of the incumbent directorsaggregate of (x) the Company attended at least 86%total number of the meetings of the Board that suchheld during the period for which he or she was a director was invited to attend. With respect to thoseand (y) the total number of meetings for all committees of the Board committees on which he or she served during 2015, the applicable directorsperiods that he or she served, (ii) one director attended at least 89%75% of the Audit Committeeaggregate of (x) the total number of meetings at least 83% of the Compensation CommitteeBoard held during the period for which he was a director and (y) the total number of meetings and 100%for all committees of the NominatingBoard on which he served during the periods that he served and Governance Committee meetings.


The Company encourages its(iii) Dr. Chang attended less than 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board held during the period for which he was a director during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Director Attendance at Annual Meeting of Stockholders

We do not have a formal policy regarding the attendance of our Board members to attendat our annual meetings of its stockholders. FourNone of the nine members of the Board members then serving attended the Company’s annual meeting2019 Annual Meeting of stockholders in 2015.


Stockholders.

Meetings of Non‑EmployeeIndependent Directors


The non-employeeindependent directors hold regular meetings without any non-independent directors or members of management present. Mr. Flatt,Lars Rodert, the independent ChairmanLead Independent Director of the Board, presides over meetings of the non‑employeeindependent directors.


Board Leadership Structure


It is the current policy of the Board that the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are separate, and that the Chairman is independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. Therefore, the positions of

Richard B. Clark serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are held by separate persons.Lars Rodert serves as the Lead Independent Director. The Board believes the current structure is appropriate and effective for the Company. The Board believes that there are advantages to having an independent Chairman of the Board for matters such as communications and relations between the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, and other senior leadership; in assisting the Board in reaching consensus on particular strategies and policies; and in facilitating robust senior leadership, Board, and Chief Executive Officer evaluation processes. In addition, the Board believes that the current leadership structure helps to ensure that the appropriate level of oversight, independence and responsibility is applied to all Board decisions, including risk oversight. The duties of the independent Chairman of the Board include: working with the Chief Executive OfficerCompany’s service providers (“Service Providers”) under its Master Services Agreement dated August 27, 2018 (the “Master Services Agreement”) and other directors to set the agenda for the Board meetings; presiding over all meetings of the Board, the Annual Meeting and executive sessions of the independent directors;Board; and serving as the principal liaison on Board‑wideBoard-wide issues. The Chairman serves as an information resource forLead Independent Director’s primary role is to facilitate the functioning of the Board (independently of the Company’s Service Providers and Brookfield Asset Management), and to maintain and enhance the quality of the Company’s corporate governance practices. The Lead Independent Director presides over the private sessions of the independent directors of the Company that take place following each meeting of the Board and acts as a liaison between directors, committee chairsconveys the results of these meetings to the Chairman of the Board. In addition, the Lead Independent Director is available, when appropriate, for consultation and management.


direct communication with our stockholders or other stakeholders of our Company.

Risk Oversight


The Company is exposed to a wide variety of risks in its business activities, including market, strategic, operational (including those related to cyber security), financial, legal, competitive and regulatory risks. OurThe Board of Directors is responsible for oversight of risks facing the Company, while our management team isthe Service Providers are responsible for day-to-day management of risk. OurThe Board, as a whole, directly administers its risk oversight function through regular interactionsits Audit Committee. Under its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the Company’s policies with ourrespect to risk assessment and management, particularly financial risk exposure, and from timediscussing with management the steps taken to time, input from independent advisors.monitor and control risks. In its oversight role, our Boardthe Audit Committee has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by managementthe Service Providers are adequate and functioning as designed. The involvement of the Board in setting our business strategy at least annually is a key part of its oversight of risk management, its assessment of management’s appetite for risk and its determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for GGP. The BoardAudit Committee receives updates in the ordinary course from managementthe Service Providers and outside advisors regarding risks we face,the Company faces, including litigation and various operating risks. The risk oversight function is also administered through the standing committees of our Board of Directors, which oversee risks inherent in their respective areas of responsibility, reporting to our Board regularly and involving our Board as necessary.



6


Our Board committees oversee certain aspects of risk management as follows:
The Audit Committee assists the Board in the oversight of the Company’s risk management process. The Audit Committee oversees risk management as it relates to GGP’s financial condition, financial statements, financial reporting process and accounting matters, the adequacy of our risk‑related internal controls, and internal investigations. The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management and the independent auditor the Company’s major financial risk exposures and any significant non‑financial risk exposures, and related policies and practices to assess and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. The Audit Committee also reviews the role of the Board in the oversight of the Company’s risks. Furthermore, a Risk Management Committee, composed of senior managers from each of the Company’s major business areas, periodically reports to the Audit Committee. The Risk Management Committee discusses the management and mitigation of the Company’s major strategic risks, shares information on risk management across the Company and manages risk in their functional area, as well as monitoring major emerging risks.

The Compensation Committee oversees GGP’s overall compensation practices, policies and programs and assessing the risks associated with such practices, policies and programs, including risks related to the executive officer compensation programs such as those that are incentive-driven compensation plans.

The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees risks related to the composition and structure of the Board of Directors and its committees and GGP’s corporate governance, including evaluating and considering evolving corporate governance best practices.

The Board and its relevant committees review with GGP’s management the risk management practices for which they have oversight responsibility. Since overseeing risk is an ongoing process and inherent in GGP’s strategic decisions, the Board and the relevant committees do not view risk in isolation, but discuss risk throughout the year in relation to proposed actions and initiatives. Further, we believe that our current leadership structure, including that of having an independent Chairman, enhances the Board’s ability to oversee the Company’s risks.
Compensation Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee believes that our compensation program does not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking that could have a material adverse effect on our Company. The following key compensation program elements were reviewed in connection with our risk assessment:
Base salaries are fixed in amount.

In determining awards under the Incentive Compensation Plan, the Compensation Committee considers a variety of short‑term individual and corporate annual performance objectives (as described below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”) that the Compensation Committee believes will yield long‑term stockholder value. The Compensation Committee uses discretion when setting Incentive Compensation Plan awards, which the Compensation Committee believes appropriately balances risk and the desire to focus executives on short‑term goals that are integral to long-term value creation. The Compensation Committee believes this process avoids putting undue emphasis on any particular performance measure.

A significant portion of the compensation provided to our named executive officers is in the form of equity awards granted pursuant to the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”). The Compensation Committee believes that these awards do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking because the total value of the awards is tied to our stock price and achievement of multi-year performance metrics, and grants are subject to time‑based vesting, which ensures that executives have significant value tied to our long‑term stock price performance. Our executive stock ownership guidelines further align the interests of our executives with our stockholders.


7


Committees of the Board of Directors

Our

The Board of Directors has the authority to appoint committees to perform certain management and administrationadministrative functions. The current standing committees are the Audit Committee the Compensation Committee and the NominatingGovernance and GovernanceNominating Committee. The Board may, however, from time to time, establish or maintain additional committees as necessary or appropriate.

The table below shows current membership for each of the standing Board committees.

Audit CommitteeNominating and
Governance and Nominating
Committee
Compensation Committee (1)
John K. Haley*Stephen DeNardo*^Richard B. ClarkMary Lou FialaOmar Carneiro de Cunha
DavidLouis J. NeithercutMarounMary Lou FialaLouis J. Bruce Flatt*Maroun*
Mark R. PattersonLars RodertMark R. Patterson*John K. HaleyLars Rodert

*Denotes Chair.

(1) Daniel B. Hurwitz was a member of the Compensation Committee during 2015, but resigned effective February 9, 2016.

*Denotes Chair.

^Denotes Audit Committee Financial Expert.

Committee members and Chairs are appointed by the Board upon recommendation of the NominatingGovernance and GovernanceNominating Committee with consideration of the desires of individual directors. The Board considerswill consider rotating committee members periodically, but the Board does not have a rotation policy.


The Board and each standing committee have the power to hire independent legal, financial or other advisors as they may deem necessary, without consulting or obtaining the approval of any officer of the Company or the Service Providers in advance. Directors have complete access to the Board’s advisors.


Each of the committees operate under a written charter. Copies of these charters can be obtained from our website at www.ggp.combpy.brookfield.com/bpyu under the “Investors—Corporate “Corporate Governance—Governance Documents” heading or by writing to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices.

Audit Committee

The Board has a standing Audit Committee, established in accordance with the requirements of the SEC. The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Haley (Chairman), Neithercut and Patterson. The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee meet the requirements for independence and expertise, including financial literacy for the purposes of serving on the Audit Committee, under applicable NYSENasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) listing standards and SEC rules. The Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. HaleyDeNardo qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under applicable SEC rules.

The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to assistresponsible for assisting and advising the Board’s oversight of:

The qualityBoard with respect to: our accounting and financial reporting processes; the integrity and audits of theour financial statements of the Company, including its financial accounting principles and policies and its internal controls over financial reporting;

The independent auditor’s qualifications, performance and independence;

The performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent auditors;

Thestatements; our compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory requirements; and

The review the qualifications, performance and approvalindependence of all related party transactions.

The Audit Committee also prepares the report required to be prepared by the committee and included in the Company’s annual meeting proxy statement pursuant to SEC rules.


8


The Audit Committee has the authority to retain and compensateour independent legal, accounting, or other advisors and experts and the Company will provide appropriate funding for the compensation of any such advisors. The Audit Committee has the sole authority (on behalf of the Company) to appoint, retain or replace the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, who reports directly to the Audit Committee, although the Audit Committee has a policy of seeking stockholder ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, as described in Proposal 3.accountants. The Audit Committee is responsible for engaging our independent auditors, reviewing the plans and results of each audit fee negotiations associatedengagement with our independent auditors, approving professional services provided by our independent accountants, considering the Company's retentionrange of Company’saudit and non-audit fees charged by our independent registered publicauditors and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting firm. The Auditcontrols.

Governance and Nominating Committee meets with the independent auditor without any member of management present, prior to release of the annual audited financial statements, to discuss the independent registered public accounting firm’s views about the qualitative aspects of the Company’s financial reporting. In order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be a regular rotation of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its investors. In conjunction with the mandated rotation of the lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee is directly involved in the selection of new lead engagement partner.

The Audit Committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention with full access to the Company’s books, records, facilities and personnel. Further, the Audit Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate.
Finally, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management and the independent auditor the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor any significant non‑financial risk exposures and related policies and practices to assess and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies, and reviews the role of the Board in the risk oversight of the Company, such as how the Board administers its oversight function.
The Audit Committee held nine meetings during 2015.
Nominating and Governance Committee

In accordance with the Nasdaq listing standards, of the NYSE, theGovernance and Nominating and Governance Committee is comprised solely of independent directors. The primary functions of the NominatingGovernance and GovernanceNominating Committee include:

Developing assisting and implementing policies, procedures and criteria foradvising the selection of qualified director candidates;

Identifying, screening and reviewing individuals qualifiedBoard with respect to become directors;

Recommendingmatters relating to the general operation of the Board, director nomineesour Company’s governance, and the performance of the Board; reviewing and assessing the qualifications of persons proposed for the next annual meeting of stockholdersappointment or to fill Board vacancies;

Assessing, developing, recommendingelection to the Board and overseeing the implementationfor recommending a slate of the Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines andnominees for election as directors by the Company’s governance practices generally;

Organizingstockholders; and undertaking the Board’s annual review of Board, committeereviewing and director performance and overall corporate governance; and

Reviewing and recommendingmaking recommendations to the Board concerning the compositionremuneration of directors and leadership of board committees.

According tocommittee members and any changes in the Nominating and Governance Committee’s charter, it has sole authority to retain any search firmfees to be usedpaid pursuant to identify director candidatesour Master Services Agreement. The Governance and Nominating Committee has approved a Conflicts Policy which addresses the sole authorityapproval and other requirements for transactions in which there is a greater potential for a conflict of interest to arise. Please see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Conflicts Policy” below for further detail. The Governance and Nominating Committee may be required to approve the search firm’s fees and other retention terms. The Nominating and Governance Committee also has the authority to retain and compensate independent advisors and experts and the Company will provide appropriate funding for the compensation of any such advisors. See “Director Nomination Process” for more information ontransactions.


Compensation Committee

The Company is a “controlled company” as defined in the Nominating and Governance Committee.

The Nominating and Governance Committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention with full access to the Company’s books, records, facilities and personnel. Further, the Nominating and Governance Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate.
The Nominating and Governance Committee held four meetings during 2015.

9


Compensation Committee
In accordance with theNasdaq listing standards and as such does not have to comply with certain of its corporate governance standards, including the NYSE, the Compensation Committee isrequirement that we have a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors. The

Compensation Committee has responsibilityInterlocks and Insider Participation

While certain of our subsidiaries have employees, BPYU does not have any employees. Under our Master Services Agreement, our Service Providers provide, or arrange for evaluatingother service providers to provide, day-to-day management and approving, asadministrative services for our Company. As a committeeresult, we do not directly pay employee or together withmanagement compensation and do not require a compensation committee. Our directors participate in the consideration of director compensation.

Director Independence

A majority of the Board (or independentis independent. Of the ten directors as appropriate) as directedbeing nominated for election by the Board, the compensation of directors and executive officersBoard affirmatively determined, based on the recommendation of the Company. The primary functions of the CompensationGovernance and Nominating Committee, include:

reviewingthat Ms. Atkinson and approving or making recommendations on the Company’s overall compensation strategyMessrs. Carneiro da Cunha, Cutler, DeNardo, Maroun, McGregor and policies;

evaluating whether the Company’s compensation structure establishes appropriate incentives for executives and other employees of the Company, including whether the Company’s compensation policies and practices for its employees and executives give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company;

reviewing and approving, in consultation with the independent directors, compensation for our Chief Executive Officer;

reviewing and approving, as a committee or together with the Board (as directed by the Board), the compensation for the other executive officers of the Company;

monitoring, reviewing and administering the Company’s compensation and benefit plans, including our Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Incentive Compensation Plan”), the Equity Plan and all other incentive‑compensation or equity‑based plans;

reviewing and approving the form and amount of compensation of directors;

preparing the Compensation Committee Report required by SEC rules to be included in our Annual Report;

reviewing and discussing with management the compensation, discussion and analysis disclosure required by SEC rules, compensation practices as related to risk management, and the disclosure in the proxy materials regarding the stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation (“say-on-pay”);

reviewing and recommending to the Board the frequency of the say-on-pay vote;

reviewing the results of the advisory say-on-pay vote and considering whether to make any adjustments to the Company’s executive compensation policies and practices;

monitoring compliance with legal prohibitions on loans from the Company to directors and executive officers of the Company;

monitoring compliance by directors and executive officers with the Company’s program of required stock ownership;

preparing recommendations and periodic reports to the Board of Directors as appropriate; and

handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the Compensation Committee by our Board of Directors from time to time.

The “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section further discusses the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities and actions.
The Compensation Committee also has the authority to retain and compensate independent legal counsel and accounting or other advisors and experts and the Company provides appropriate funding for the compensation of any such advisors. However, before selecting an advisor, the Committee considers the independence of such person or entity, including consideration of the following factors: (1) other services provided to the Company by the advisor; (2) fees paid by the Company as a percentage of the advisor’s total revenue; (3) policies or procedures maintained by the advisor that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and a member of the Committee; (5) any Company stock owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and (6) any business or personal relationships between the Company’s executive officers and the advisor or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. The Compensation Committee did not engage advisors in 2015.

10


The Compensation Committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention with full access to the Company’s books, records, facilities and personnel. The Compensation Committee may form and delegate any of its responsibilities to a subcommittee so long as such subcommittee is solely comprised of one or more members of the Compensation Committee and such delegation is not otherwise inconsistent with law and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE. Furthermore, the Compensation Committee may, by resolution approved by a majority of the Committee, delegate to management the administration of the Company’s incentive compensation and equity‑based compensation plans, to the extent permitted by law and as may be permitted by such plans and subject to such rules, policies and guidelines (including limits on the aggregate awards that may be made pursuant to such delegation) as the Compensation Committee shall approve, provided that, the Compensation Committee shall determine and approve the awards made under such plan to any executive officer and any other member of senior management as the Compensation Committee shall designate and shall at least annually review the awards made to such other members of senior management as the Compensation Committee shall designate.
The Compensation Committee held six meetings during 2015.
Director Independence
The Board consists of nine directors, all of whom, other than our Chief Executive Officer,Rodert are independent withinunder the meaning of theNasdaq listing standards of the NYSE.
standards.

The Board reviewed director independence in February 2016.2020. During this review, the Board considered transactions and relationships between each director nominee (including any member of his or her immediate family, if any) and the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. In making independence determinations, the Board considered each relationship not only from the standpoint of the director nominee, but also from the standpoint of persons and organizations with which the director nominee has a relationship. The purpose of this review is to determine whether any such relationship or transactions would interfere with the director’s or nominee’s independent judgment, and therefore be inconsistent with a determination that the director nominee is independent.

When assessing the independence of the directors designated by Brookfield,the BPY General Partner pursuant to the Joint Governance Agreement, the Board considered that they were nominated by significant stockholders of the Company but concluded that this did not impair their independence. As required by the NYSE,Nasdaq listing standards, the Board considered whether the nominated director himselfdirectors themselves had a material relationship with GGP (directly or as a partner, stockholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with GGP). A relationship is “material” if, in the judgment of the Board, the relationshipBPYU that would interfere with the director’s independent judgment. judgment in carrying out their duties as a director.

As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that the following memberseach of the Company’s Board, including each of those directors standing for election at the Annual Meeting (three of whom were nominated by Brookfield), aredirector nominees, except Dr. Chang and Messrs. Clark and Blidner, is independent of the Company and its management under NYSENasdaq listing standards:standards. Dr. Chang is not independent because he was appointed to the board of directors of the BPY General Partner as the representative of a large shareholder of BPY and Messrs. Clark Flatt, Haley, Hurwitz, Kingston, Neithercut, and Patterson and Ms. Fiala. Mr. Mathrani isBlidner are not independent due to histheir employment as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

with Brookfield Asset Management.

Important Governance Policies

We pride ourselves on our observance of best practices in corporate governance. Our policies are designed to ensure that the Company is managed for the long‑term benefit of its stockholders and to enhance the creation of long‑term stockholder value.
Corporate Governance Highlights
ŸAnnual election of directorsŸRegular board and committee self-evaluation process
ŸMajority vote standard in uncontested electionsŸCommittee authority to retain independent advisors
ŸMajority vote standard for mergers and business combinationsŸRigorous share ownership guidelines for both directors and executive officers
ŸStockholders owning 15% or more of our outstanding stock may call a special meetingŸAnti-hedging policy
Ÿ
No stockholder rights plan
(also known as a "poison pill")
ŸClawback policy to recoup executive compensation
ŸRegular executive sessions of independent directorsŸCommitment to sustainability
Ÿ
Independent board
(all directors other than CEO are independent)
ŸRobust code of ethics
ŸSeparate Board Chairman and CEOŸComprehensive succession planning program

11


Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which,to assist the Board in the exercise of its responsibilities. The Corporate Governance Guidelines govern, among other matters:

describe director qualifications (i) the evaluation of directors and responsibilities;
establish a director resignation policy;
provide that our directors have full and free accessnominees for election to the Company’s officers and employees;
require the Board to conduct an annual self‑evaluation; and
set forthBoard; (ii) stock ownership guidelines for our non-employeedirectors; (iii) the resignation of directors; (iv) compensation paid to directors and executive officers.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that no director may serve on more than three other public company boards unless the Board determines thatperiodic evaluation of such simultaneous service would not impaircompensation; (iv) access to independent advisors; and (v) the individual’s ability to effectively serve on the Board. Directors must advise the Chairmanannual evaluation process of the Board and the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee in advance of accepting an invitation to serve on another public company board or any assignment to the audit committee or compensation committee of the board of any public company of which such director is already a member.
In addition, individual directors who substantially change the principal occupation or business association they held when they were elected to the Board are expected to volunteer to resign from the Board in order to provide an opportunity for the Board, through the Nominating and Governance Committee, to review the appropriateness of continued Board membership under the circumstances.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require any nominee for director in an uncontested election at our Annual Meeting to tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee if a majority of the votes represented by shares of the Company that are outstanding and entitled to vote in the election are designated to be “withheld” from or are voted “against” his or her election.
The Nominating and Governance Committee will then evaluate the best interest of the Company and its stockholders and recommend to the Board of Directors the action to be taken with respect to any tendered resignation.
committees.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at www.ggp.combpy.brookfield.com/bpyu under the “Investors—Corporate Governance”“Corporate Governance—Governance Documents” heading. In addition, a copy may be obtained by writing to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices.


Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors and Executive Officers

The Board believes that stock ownershipdirectors can better represent our stockholders if they have economic exposure to our Company themselves. Our Company expects that our independent directors should hold sufficient BPY units or Class A Shares such that the acquisition costs of such securities held by its non-employeesuch directors is an important component of its corporate governance policies. Our stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors, which are included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, require that each non-employee director, other than those designated by a significant investor, ownequal to at least two times their annual retainer, as determined by the lesserBoard from time to time.

Independent directors are required to purchase BPY limited partnership units or Class A Shares on an annual basis in an amount not less than 20% of 25,000 shares or shares having a market valuethe minimum economic ownership requirement until the requirement is met. Independent directors are required to achieve this minimum economic ownership within five years of $525,000joining the Board. In the event of our common stockan increase in the annual retainer fee, the independent directors will have two years from the date of the change to comply with the ownership requirement. In the case of independent directors who have served on the Board less than five years at the date of the change, such directors will be required to comply with the ownership requirement by the date that is the later of: (i) the fifth anniversary of the director’s electiontheir appointment to the Board, and each anniversary thereafter.(ii) two years following the date of the change in retainer fee. All of our non-employeeindependent directors comply withhave met this minimum economic ownership requirement.

Generally, directors are prohibited from entering into any transactions which have the stockeffect of hedging the economic value of BPY limited partnership units or Class A Shares that they own. However, under limited circumstances, a director may be permitted to enter into a hedging transaction in respect of interests held by such individual in excess of the minimum economic ownership guidelines.

Executive officers are alsorequirement and subject to stock ownership guidelines, which are described below in “Compensation Discussionthe approval of both the Chief Executive Officer and Analysis.”
Chief Financial Officer of the Company’s Service Providers.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Board has adopted the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Conduct”) of Brookfield Asset Management, which is applicable to all directors, officers, employees directors and officerstemporary workers of the Company andBrookfield Asset Management, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliates. Thecertain publicly-traded controlled affiliates who have not adopted their own Code of Conduct, includes a process and a toll‑free telephone number for anonymous reports of potentially inappropriate conduct or potential violations ofincluding the Company.

Our Code of Conduct.Conduct is available on our website at bpy.brookfield.com/bpyu under the “Corporate Governance—Governance Documents” heading. In addition, a copy may be obtained by writing to our Secretary at our principal executive offices. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or a waiver of, a provision of the Code of Conduct for the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller, or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on the Company’s website.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at www.ggp.com under the “Investors—Corporate Governance Documents” heading. In addition, a copy may be obtained by writing to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices.

12


Insider Trading Policy
The Company’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits aggressive or speculative trading in our securities by our officers, directors and employees and their respective family members, including, but not limited to, short sales of GGP stock, the purchase of put or call options, or the writing of such options with respect to GGP securities. The policy also prohibits hedging transactions, including through the use of financial instruments such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s securities. In addition, our officers, directors, employees and their respective family members may not pledge or otherwise use Company securities as collateral for a margin loan or any other loan where the obligation to repay such loan is affected by the value of the Company’s securities, unless approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
Clawback Policy
The Board has adopted a Clawback Policy that requires reimbursement of any annual incentive payment or long‑term incentive payment to an executive officer where: (1) the payment was predicated upon achieving certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a substantial restatement of Company financial statements filed with the SEC; (2) the Board determines the executive engaged in intentional misconduct that caused or substantially caused the need for the substantial restatement; and (3) a lower payment would have been made to the executive based upon the restated financial results. In each such instance, the Company will, to the extent practicable, seek to recover from the individual executive the amount by which the individual executive’s incentive payments for the relevant period exceeded the lower payment that would have been made based on the restated financial results. For purposes of this policy, the term “executive officer” means any officer who has been designated an executive officer by the Board.

13


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related Party Transactions Policy

Our written Related Party Transactions Policy is designed to assist with the proper identification, review and disclosure of related party transactions. Under this policy, any transaction or proposed transaction between the Company and related parties is required to be disclosed to the Audit Committee, and the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving such transactions. The Audit Committee may only approve a transaction between the Company and a related party if the transaction is on terms that are comparable to terms the Company could obtain in an arm’s‑length transaction with an unrelated third party, and either the term of the transaction does not exceed one year or the Company can terminate the agreement evidencing the transaction upon reasonable notice to the related party. A related party for purposes of this policy means:

An officer or director of the Company;

A stockholder directly or indirectly beneficially owning in excess of 5% of the Company;

A person who is an immediate family member of, or shares a household with, an officer or director; or

An entity that is either wholly or substantially owned or controlled by someone listed above.

This policy does not apply to transactions in which all Company employees may participate, a transaction that involves compensation for services rendered to the Company as an employee or director, or a transaction that involves the conversion or redemption of outstanding interests in the Operating Partnership.
Related Party Transactions

During 2015, there were no transactions meeting the definition of a related party transaction under the Related Party Transaction Policy, nor were there any related party transactions required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.




14


INVESTMENT AGREEMENT WITH BROOKFIELD

Pursuant to a series of restructuring transactions contemplated by our emergence from bankruptcy in 2010, we entered into a series of investment agreements, including an investment agreement (the “Investment Agreement”) with affiliates of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (collectively, with its designees, as applicable, “Brookfield”).

Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, our Board of Directors is required to have nine members, three of whom were designated by Brookfield (“Brookfield Designees”). Brookfield’s right to designate three directors will continue so long as Brookfield beneficially owns at least 20% of our common stock on a fully diluted basis, with such right reducing to two directors if Brookfield beneficially owns between 15% and 20% of our common stock on a fully diluted basis and one director if Brookfield beneficially owns between 10% and 15% of our common stock on a fully diluted basis. Brookfield will have no right to designate a director if it beneficially owns less than 10% of our common stock on a fully diluted basis.
Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Agreement, the Company is obligated to nominate the Brookfield Designees, as part of its slate of directors, and use its reasonable best efforts to have such persons elected to the Company’s Board of Directors (subject to applicable law and NYSE rules). The Brookfield Designees are subject to such eligibility criteria as are applied in good faith by our Nominating and Governance Committee and Board to other candidates. See “Director Nomination Process” above.
Brookfield may designate a Brookfield Designee’s replacement upon the death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office of such designee. In addition, subject to applicable law and NYSE rules, the Brookfield Designees must have proportional representation on any committee of the Board of Directors, except for special committees established for potential conflict of interest situations involving Brookfield or any affiliate thereof, and except that only designees who qualify under the applicable rules of the applicable stock exchange or the SEC may serve on committees where such qualification is required.
In accordance with the Investment Agreement, Messrs. Clark, Flatt and Kingston are Brookfield Designees.
In addition, pursuant to the standstill agreement entered into between us and Brookfield, in connection with any stockholder meeting or consent solicitation relating to the election of members of the Board, Brookfield may vote all of its shares of common stock as it wishes with respect to its nominees referred to in the preceding paragraph and, with respect to other nominees, may vote shares representing up to 10% of the outstanding common stock as it wishes but must vote the rest of its shares in proportion to the votes cast by other stockholders (excluding shares contractually required to be voted in proportion to the total number of votes cast pursuant to the standstill agreement).


15


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Directors who are our employees receive no fees for their services as directors. Non-employee directors receive an annual fee for their service on the Board and reimbursement of expenses incurred in attending meetings.

The chart below sets forth the fee structure for non‑employee directors from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015.
Annual Fees:
All non-employee Directors, including Chairman$175,000
(1)
Chairman$25,000
Audit Committee Chair$25,000
Compensation Committee Chair$15,000
Nominating and Governance Committee Chair$10,000
Equity Awards:
New Director Award$75,000
(2)

(1)Payable quarterly in arrears in cash, restricted stock of the Company and/or FV LTIP units (see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" for a description of the FV LTIP units) in the proportion elected by each non-employee director before the end of the prior calendar year. The number of restricted stock of the Company to be issued pursuant to the Equity Plan in payment of the portion of the annual fee shall be determined using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the first trading day of the calendar year, with such number of shares to be rounded to the nearest whole share. The number of FV LTIP units to be issued pursuant to the Equity Plan in payment of the portion of the annual fee shall be determined using the Duff and Phelps value on the first trading day of the calendar year, with such number of units to be rounded to the nearest whole. The equity will be granted at the beginning of the year, but will vest over the calendar year 25% on the last day of each calendar quarter. A non‑employee director, other than those designated by a significant stockholder, must elect to receive at least 2/3 of his or her annual fee in the form of restricted stock of the Company and/or FV LTIP units if such director does not meet the thresholds set forth in the Company’s Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non‑Employee Directors (see “Corporate Governance—Important Governance Policies” for a description of our Stock Ownership Guidelines). If a director is no longer a director at the end of the calendar quarter, no cash payment for the quarter will be due to the director and the restricted shares and/or FV LTIP units scheduled to vest as of the end of that quarter and thereafter will be forfeited. If a non-employee director joins the Board mid‑year, the entire amount of the annual fee for the remainder of the year shall be paid in cash.

(2)The New Director Award shall be in the form of restricted stock of the Company and vests one-third on the grant date and one-third on each of the first and second anniversaries of the grant date. The number of shares to be issued is determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day either on or after the grant date (rounded to the nearest whole share).




16


In November 2015, the Compensation Committee of the Board reviewed the compensation of directors and determined that the Company's 2016 non-employee director annual fees should be increased to $200,000 to compete with peer companies.

The following table summarizes the compensation earned by or paid to each of our non-employee directors in 2015.

2015 Director Compensation
NameFees Earned
or
Paid in Cash
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
Richard B. Clark*175,000
 

175,000
Mary Lou Fiala58,333
 116,655

174,988
J. Bruce Flatt*(2)
 


John K. Haley25,000
(3) 
174,996

199,996
Daniel B. Hurwitz
 175,011

175,011
Brian W. Kingston*175,000
 

175,000
David J. Neithercut
 175,011

175,011
Mark R. Patterson68,333
(4) 
116,673

185,006
* Denotes director designated by Brookfield.     

(1)Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock or FV LTIP units computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

(2)Mr. Flatt elected to waive his 2015 director compensation and Compensation Committee chair fees.

(3)This amount includes $25,000 in Audit Committee chair fees paid to Mr. Haley.

(4)This amount includes $10,000 in Nominating and Governance Committee chair fees paid to Mr. Patterson.

Directors are encouraged to periodically participate in educational programs related to the responsibilities of directors of publicly-traded companies.


17


PROPOSAL 2
APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote
FOR this proposal (Item 2 on the Proxy Card).

Section 14A of the Exchange Act requires that we provide in this Proxy Statement a non-binding stockholder advisory vote on our executive compensation, as described in this Proxy Statement (commonly referred to as “say‑on‑pay”). At our 2011 annual meeting, our stockholders voted on a non-binding basis in favor of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation every year, consistent with the recommendation of our Board. After consideration of these results, we have decided to hold future advisory votes on executive compensation each year until the next advisory vote on frequency occurs. The next advisory vote on frequency will be held in 2017.
This vote will provide us with information regarding investor sentiment about our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee will consider the results of the say-on-pay vote when determining executive compensation for the remainder of 2016 and beyond.
We encourage stockholders to review the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, which discusses our compensation policies and programs for 2015. For 2015, our executive compensation program was designed to pay for performance and align our compensation programs with business strategies focused on long-term growth and creating value for stockholders while also paying competitively and focusing on the total compensation perspective. We feel this design is evidenced by the following:
We provide a significant portion of our total compensation in the form of performance-based compensation.

Our annual performance‑based cash awards are based on the achievement of corporate financial measures, such as adjusted EBITDA, and individual goals and objectives that promote the Company’s success.

Our long-term incentive opportunities are based on achieving long-term stockholder value.

The Compensation Committee retains discretion over annual performance-based cash awards and performance share grants applicable to the named executive officers and has exercised such discretion to limit the amount that would otherwise have been payable under such awards.

We provide a mix of short-term and long-term and cash and non-cash compensation that we believe allows us to strike a balance between offering competitive executive compensation packages and aligning executive officer compensation with business strategies focused on long‑term growth and creating value for stockholders.

The Board strongly endorses the Company’s executive compensation program and recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s rules and regulations, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and narrative discussion is, hereby approved on an advisory basis.

The vote on the resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the advisory vote relates to the overall compensation of our executive officers. Because the vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee and neither the Board of Directors nor the Compensation Committee will be required to take any action as a result of the outcome of the vote on this proposal. The Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.


18


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The executive officers of the Company are generally appointed by the Board annually and are currently as follows:
NamePosition
Sandeep MathraniChief Executive Officer
Michael B. BermanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Shobi KhanExecutive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Alan J. BarocasSenior Executive Vice President, Leasing
Marvin J. LevineExecutive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
Richard S. PesinExecutive Vice President, Anchors, Development and Construction
Tara L. MarszewskiSenior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Please see the “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” section for biographical information concerning Mr. Mathrani.
Biographical information concerning the rest of our executive officers is set forth below.
Michael B. Berman, 58
Mr. Berman joined GGP in December 2011 and currently serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From December 2005 until he joined GGP, Mr. Berman served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (“ELS”). From September 2003 until December 2005, Mr. Berman served as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of ELS. During 2003, Mr. Berman was an associate professor at the New York University Real Estate Institute. Mr. Berman was a managing director in the Investment Banking department at Merrill Lynch & Co. from 1997 to 2002. Mr. Berman is a member of the Columbia Business School Real Estate Advisory Board, a member of the Board of Directors of Brixmor Property Group Inc., and a member of the Commercial & Retail Development Council of the Urban Land Institute. Mr. Berman received an M.B.A. from Columbia University Graduate School of Business, a J.D. from Boston University School of Law, and a B.A. from Binghamton University in New York.
Shobi Khan, 50
Mr. Khan joined GGP in June 2011 and currently serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. As Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Khan’s oversight includes asset management, investments, joint-venture partnerships, and day-to-day operations. From December 2010 until he joined GGP, Mr. Khan served as U.S. chief investment officer at Bentall Kennedy, one of North America’s largest real estate investment advisors, where he held direct responsibility for U.S. investment activity and served on the company’s management group and investment committees. Prior to Bentall Kennedy, Mr. Khan was senior vice president of investments at Equity Office Properties Trust (“EOP”). During his 11 years at EOP, he led the underwriting of $16 billion in office REIT mergers and was involved with EOP’s $39 billion sale to Blackstone in 2007. Prior to joining EOP in 1996, Mr. Khan served with Katz Hollis, Inc. in Los Angeles, where he completed more than $5 billion in tax allocation bond transactions and public/private-financing assignments throughout the United States. Before joining Katz Hollis, he was with Arthur Andersen LLP in San Francisco, where he was responsible for various real estate consulting engagements. Mr. Khan holds an MBA from the University of Southern California and a bachelor’s degree from the University of California at Berkeley. He is an active member of the ICSC.
Alan J. Barocas, 67
Mr. Barocas joined GGP in January 2011 and currently serves as Senior Executive Vice President of Leasing. Mr. Barocas was the principal of Alan J Barocas and Associates, a retail real estate consulting group that he founded in May 2006, specializing in assisting retailers, developers and investment groups in the development, execution and assessment of their growth and investment strategies. Prior to May 2006, Mr. Barocas spent 25 years at Gap, Inc., the last 20 of which he held various executive positions in its real estate department including as Senior Vice President of Real Estate and Construction from October 2000 until his departure from Gap, Inc. in 2006. Mr. Barocas was a past trustee of ICSC. In January 2007, Mr. Barocas was named to the Board of Directors of Stage Stores, Inc. Mr. Barocas received a B.S. in Business Administration from the University at Albany.

19


Marvin J. Levine, 66
Mr. Levine joined GGP in January 2011 and currently serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer. From 2002 until he joined GGP, he served as Of Counsel to Wachtel, Masyr & Missry, LLP. From 2000 through 2001 he served as partner of Husch Blackwell LLP. From 1994 until 1999 he served as a partner and member of the management committee of Wachtel, Masyr & Missry, LLP. Mr. Levine received a B.S. from Lehigh University and a J.D. from New York University.
Richard S. Pesin, 52
Mr. Pesin joined GGP in January 2011 and currently serves as Executive Vice President of Anchors, Development and Construction. Since joining GGP, Mr. Pesin has initiated and is executing a retail development pipeline in excess of $2.5 billion. Prior to GGP, Mr. Pesin was Executive Vice President and Director of Retail Development for Forest City Ratner Companies where he oversaw all aspects of retail development and leasing. Mr. Pesin led the company’s program to bring innovative shopping centers to underserved urban markets. During his 15 year tenure with Forest City, Mr. Pesin was directly responsible for more than 4.5 million square feet with a cost of more than $1.5 billion of new development. Mr. Pesin is a graduate of Duke University with a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Political Science and shortly thereafter in 1985 he began his career in the shopping center industry.
Tara L. Marszewski, 36
Ms. Marszewski joined GGP in January 2012 and has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since October 2014. From January 2012 until October 2014, Ms. Marszewski served as Vice President – Public Reporting & Accounting Policy. From May 2002 until January 2012, she served as Senior Manager - Audit, Real Estate of KPMG LLP. From May 2001 until May 2002, she served as Staff Audit Associate of Arthur Andersen LLP. Ms. Marszewski received a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Illinois at Urbana.


20


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis

General Growth Properties’ compensation philosophy and corporate governance standards are designed to align executive compensation with long-term stockholder interests. We focus on adhering to best practices in corporate governance and executive compensation policies.

The primary goals of our executive compensation program are to attract, motivate and retain high-quality executives. We seek to foster a performance‑oriented environment by directly linking a significant part of each executive officer’s total compensation to short-term operating performance and long-term stockholder value creation. In support of this goal, the Compensation Committee has established the following executive compensation objectives:
Competitive Total CompensationŸCompetitiveness is a significant factor considered in establishing executive compensation.
Ÿ

While the Compensation Committee evaluates and discusses peer compensation data to help inform its decision making process, the Compensation Committee does not set compensation levels at any specific level or percentile against peer group data.
ŸThe Compensation Committee does not “benchmark” GGP’s executive compensation levels, particularly on an individual basis, but rather evaluates overall pay in aggregate across the executive team. Peer group data is only a reference point taken into account by the Compensation Committee in determining compensation decisions.
Align Executive Interests with Stockholder InterestsŸThe Compensation Committee seeks to align compensation with business strategies focused on long-term growth and sustained stockholder value.
ŸA large portion of our executives’ pay is “at risk” and dependent upon the achievement of specific corporate and individual performance goals.
ŸThe vast majority of pay is delivered in equity. Equity incentive awards are subject to multi-year vesting schedules, which contribute to continuity and stability within the Company’s executive leadership and encourage executives to act as owners with a tangible stake in the Company. The Company pays higher compensation when goals are exceeded and lower compensation when goals are not met.
Compensation Commensurate with Employees' ValueŸTotal compensation is higher for individuals with greater responsibility and greater ability to influence the Company’s achievement of targeted results and strategic initiatives.
ŸAs position and responsibility increases, the proportion of an executive’s total compensation that is based on Company performance objectives increases, while the proportion based on individual performance decreases.
Transparent Compensation ProgramsŸOur executive compensation program is designed to be transparent and easily identifiable.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) discusses the 2015 compensation policies and decisions related to our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) and should be read together with the NEO compensation tables found on page 36 of this Proxy Statement. For purposes of this Proxy Statement, our 2015 NEOs include the following individuals, each of whom started with the Company in 2011:

Sandeep Mathrani, Chief Executive Officer;
Michael Berman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
Shobi Khan, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer;
Alan Barocas, Senior Executive Vice President, Leasing; and
Richard Pesin, Executive Vice President, Anchors, Development and Construction.


21


2015 Performance Highlights

During 2015, GGP completed several transactions and achieved operational goals that promote our long-term strategy and enhance the quality of our overall portfolio. Highlights include (figures shown represent our proportionate share):

Leased 8.9 million square feet commencing in 2015;
Achieved suite-to-suite lease spreads on leases commencing in 2015 of 10.8%;
Invested to date $1.4 billion into development projects;
Sold a total 37.5% interest in Ala Moana Center to joint venture partners for total consideration of $2.0 billion;
Acquired interests in two retail properties located in New York City (730 Fifth Ave and 85 Fifth Ave) for total consideration of $710.2 million (including closing costs), which included equity of $222.5 million and the assumption of debt of $487.7 million;
Acquired a 50% interest in a joint venture with Sears Holdings Corporation (subsequently sold to Seritage Growth Properties) that owns anchor pads and in-place leases at 12 stores located at our properties for approximately $165.0 million;
Sold interests in three assets for total consideration of $174.6 million, which resulted in a gain of $27.0 million;
Repurchased 4.3 million of our common shares at $25.34 per share for a total price of $109.6 million;
Acquired an additional 2.5% equity interest in Miami Design District Associates, LLC, a large urban retail development project for $40.0 million; and
Purchased 1,125,760 shares of Seritage Growth Properties common stock at $29.58 per share for a total of $33.3 million as part of the spin-off from Sears Holdings Corporation.

2015 Compensation Decisions and Actions
Factors Guiding Compensation Decisions
(see page 26 for details)
ŸExecutive compensation program philosophy and objectives
ŸFinancial performance
ŸRecommendations of the CEO for other NEOs
ŸAssessment of risk management, including avoidance of unnecessary or excessive risk taking to ensure long-term stockholder value
ŸStockholder input including "say-on-pay" vote
ŸMarket pay practices
ŸCurrent and historical compensation
2015 Program Updates

Aligning Long-Term Incentives with Stockholder Interests

In direct response to input from stockholders, and to provide a balanced market-competitive compensation package that reinforces the Company’s commitment to paying for performance, GGP introduced changes to awards granted under the Equity Plan for 2015 service. These changes include requiring NEOs to accept half the value of their Equity Plan awards in the form of performance-vesting restricted stock or performance-vesting full value long-term incentive plan units (“FV LTIP units”), with the other half delivered in stock options or appreciation only long-term incentive plan units (“AO LTIP units”).

Adding another performance-vesting component to Equity Plan awards further aligns our executive compensation program with stockholder interests. For more details on long-term incentives under our Equity Plan, see page 31.


Equity Plan Awards
for 2014 Service
Equity Plan Awards
for 2015 Service
Ÿ NEO's choice of:
Ÿ NEO's choice of performance-vesting FV LTIP units
– Restricted Stockor performance-vesting Restricted Stock (50%)
– Stock Options
Ÿ NEO's choice of AO LTIP units or Stock Options (50%)
– FV LTIP units
– AO LTIP units

22


Key 2015 Compensation Decisions

The compensation decisions outlined below demonstrate our strong, sustained commitment to paying for performance.

Base Salary
There were no NEO base salary increases in 2015; none of the NEOs have received a base salary increase since they joined GGP.

Annual Incentive
On the basis of the assessment referenced above, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Mathrani a cash award of $3,000,000, representing 100% of his target cash award.

On the basis of the assessments of the goals described above, the Compensation Committee awarded each of Messrs. Berman, Khan, Barocas and Pesin a cash award of $800,000 representing 107% of their target cash awards.

Long-Term Incentives under the Equity Plan
In January 2015, each NEO chose to receive his equity award for 2014 performance in the form of FV LTIP units. The values of these awards ranged from approximately $1,750,000 to $10,000,000.

As stated above, GGP recently introduced changes to awards granted under the Equity Plan in direct response to stockholder feedback. The first grants under this redesigned plan were made in February 2016, when NEOs were awarded a combination of AO LTIP units and performance-vesting FV LTIP units for 2015 performance. The values of these awards ranged from approximately $1,750,000 to $8,500,000.



2015 Stockholder Outreach and Feedback
In evaluating the design of our executive compensation programs and the specific compensation decisions for each of our NEOs, the Compensation Committee considered stockholder input. In 2015, following the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, management actively engaged with our stockholders to seek feedback on the Company’s compensation program.

Strengthening the connection between pay and performance in the Equity Plan was the primary theme articulated by stockholders. After careful consideration of this feedback, the Compensation Committee proposed introducing performance-vesting FV LTIP units and performance-vesting restricted stock as new equity vehicles, and requiring NEOs to accept 50% of their Equity Plan award in this form. Along with stock options, these new forms of performance-vesting equity provide an incentive to achieve our long-term financial objectives, reinforcing our commitment to paying for performance.

Management discussed the proposed change with eight stockholders representing 20% of non-Brookfield share ownership. We reviewed all of the non-Brookfield shareholders and targeted the largest of those shareholders for discussion. Given the consistency of what we heard from these discussions, we believe the views of these shareholders are reflective of our broader shareholder base. The change was implemented in 2016, affecting long-term incentive awards made in February 2016 for 2015 performance and has further aligned the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.



23


CEO Pay at a Glance

The Compensation Committee determined that the appropriate total direct compensation was $12,700,000 for Mr. Mathrani in 2015. The Compensation Committee considered the total compensation package in relation to the target established for the position, taking into account the scope of responsibilities for the particular position. Further details are provided on page 29.

Year-Over-Year Change in CEO Total Direct Compensation
(Excluding One-Time Employment Agreement Award)
Base SalaryAnnual Incentive CompensationLong-Term Incentive Compensation
20142015% Change20142015% Change20142015% Change
$1,200,000$1,200,0000.0%$3,000,000$3,000,0000.0%$10,000,000$8,500,000-15.0%

2015 CEO Employment Agreement

As CEO, Mr. Mathrani’s leadership skills and demonstrated ability to drive business results are critical to the long-term success of the Company. As an incentive to remain with GGP and continue this record of success, Mr. Mathrani received an incentive package in February 2015 in exchange for signing a five year employment agreement. Similar to his initial employment agreement, this renewed agreement included the following:

Base salary of $1,200,000.
Target annual cash award of $3,000,000 (guaranteed at $2,000,000 for 2015 and 2016).
Long-term incentive grant valued at $25,000,000 (delivered in FV LTIP units) that cliff-vest in January 2020, subject to Mr. Mathrani’s continued employment and other terms set forth in his employment agreement.

For additional information on Mr. Mathrani’s employment agreement, see page 44.

Aligning Pay with Performance

Pay-for-performance is foundational to our executive compensation philosophy. To ensure that we are adhering to this principle, we evaluate the degree of alignment of our total incentive compensation to our business results, including EBITDA and FFO, as described on page 30.
Elements of our executive total rewards consist of base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives, retirement income programs and other benefits.

The Company uses a balance of short-and long-term incentives as well as cash and non-cash compensation to meet these objectives. The elements of executive compensation provided to our NEOs for 2015 performance consisted of base salary, annual incentives, and long-term incentives. Our compensation programs are designed to link pay and performance.


24


Program Design: 91% of the 2015 total direct compensation delivered to Mr. Mathrani and between 77%-84% delivered to the other NEOs is comprised of incentive-based pay.

Performance Assessment: Our Compensation Committee uses a comprehensive and well-defined process to assess Company performance. We believe our metrics focus management on the appropriate objectives for the creation of both short- and long-term stockholder value.

The Company’s incentive compensation programs for executives are designed to link compensation with the full spectrum of our business goals, some of which are short term, while others take several years or more to achieve, as shown in the chart below:

Short Term (Cash)Long Term (Equity)
Incentive Compensation Plan
Stock Options
AO LTIP units
Performance-Vesting Restricted Stock
Performance-Vesting FV LTIP units
Objective:
Short-term operational
business priorities
Long-term stockholder
value creation
Long-term stockholder
value creation
Time Horizon:1 YearUp to 10 Years3 Years
Metrics:Varies based on each NEO’s area of responsibility. See page 29 for details.Stock price
Ÿ 25% relative TSR
(FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index)
Ÿ 25% relative TSR
(FTSE NAREIT Retail REIT Index)
Ÿ 25% absolute TSR
Ÿ 25% FFO per diluted share

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Compensation Committee believes that our executive officers should have a meaningful investment in Company common stock in order to more closely align their interests with those of our stockholders. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has established a policy requiring minimum equity ownership, including options to purchase common stock, by our executive officers based on their position with the Company. Each executive officer (defined as an “officer” under Rule 16a‑1(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) shall meet the specific share ownership requirements based on a multiple of base salary set forth in the following table by the fifth anniversary of the executive officer’s appointment to his or her position.

NEOStock Ownership Guidelines
Chief Executive Officer5x
Executive Vice President3x
Senior Vice President2x

All of the NEOs comply with the executive stock ownership guidelines. The Company also has stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors which are described under “Corporate Governance-Important Governance Policies” in this Proxy Statement.

Clawback Policy

As described above, the Company has adopted a Clawback Policy covering incentive compensation paid to our executive officers to further align management with the interests of stockholders over the long term.


25


Determining Compensation

Role of the Compensation Committee

Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee, as a committee or together with the Board of Directors (or independent directors as appropriate), is responsible for the overall review, modification and approval of corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and the other officers of the Company. The Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice of compensation consultants as it deems necessary to assist in the evaluation of director or executive officer compensation and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any such compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee did not engage a compensation consultant in 2015.
In establishing and reviewing the Company’s compensation programs, the Compensation Committee considers whether the programs encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking and has determined that they do not.

Role of the CEO

Mr. Mathrani plays a significant role in the compensation‑setting process for executive officers other than himself. The most significant aspect of his role includes recommending the base salary and incentive awards of the other executive officers and evaluating the performance of the other executive officers. Mr. Mathrani regularly participates in meetings of the Compensation Committee to provide this information.

Role of the Human Resources Department and Willis Towers Watson

The Company’s Human Resources Department researches and compiles market compensation data as directed by the Compensation Committee. In 2015, the Human Resources Department provided to the Compensation Committee compensation data for named executive officers of the companies in the peer group determined by the Compensation Committee, as described below. With the help of Willis Towers Watson, the data was collected from the peer group’s proxy statements and other publicly available sources. Also as directed, the Human Resources Department assists with the design of GGP’s annual and long-term incentive awards prior to their proposal to the Compensation Committee, and did so in 2015, when the Company redesigned its long-term incentive program in response to stockholder feedback. As part of this redesign, the Human Resources Department engaged independent consulting firm Willis Towers Watson to assist with data collection and long-term incentive plan design details.

Use of Peer Group Data

The Compensation Committee used the peer group data provided by the Human Resources Department to gain a greater understanding of market practices in connection with our overall compensation decisions and to evaluate the structure of our compensation program. For purposes of compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee does not target a single percentile or range of percentiles to be paid, or use peer compensation data to set precise pay levels by position, but rather uses this information in connection with its review of our executives’ relative performance compared to their objectives in light of business conditions and developments during the year.


26


The peer group, determined by the Compensation Committee, is comprised of companies in the retail (mall focused) sector classification of real estate companies and comparably‑sized (primarily based on market capitalization) companies in other sectors of the public real estate industry. The peer group consists of all REITs in the S&P 500, as well as Taubman Centers, Inc. and Westfield Group. The Compensation Committee believes companies in the peer group include companies that generally recruit individuals to fill senior management positions who are similar in skills and background to those we recruit.

2015 Peer Group Companies
Ÿ AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Ÿ Public Storage
Ÿ Boston Properties, Inc.
Ÿ Simon Property Group, Inc.
Ÿ Equity Residential
Ÿ Taubman Centers, Inc.
Ÿ HCP, Inc.
Ÿ Ventas, Inc.
Ÿ Host Hotels and Resorts, Inc.
Ÿ Vornado Realty Trust
Ÿ Kimco Realty Corp.
Ÿ Welltower, Inc.
Ÿ The Macerich Company
Ÿ Westfield Group
Ÿ Prologis, Inc.

The Compensation Committee considered the market data and the objectives of the executive compensation program and concluded that the payments of cash and grants of incentive awards to the NEOs for 2015 discussed under “Elements of Compensation” and the payments of cash and grants of incentive awards made to the other executive officers for 2015 were reasonable and consistent with the Company’s philosophy and policies.
What We DoWhat We Don’t Do
þ
Do link pay to performance by rewarding NEOs based on the value they create for the Company and stockholders.

ý
No compensation strategies that focus pay on short-term results to the detriment of long-term goals.
þ
Do put pay at risk based on performance - over 90% of our CEO’s pay and at least 75% of each NEO’s pay is at-risk based on performance.

ý
No incentives that encourage excessively risky behavior.
þ
Do set meaningful performance goals at the beginning of each performance period.
ý
No discounted stock options, stock option reloads, or stock option repricing (except in connection with certain corporate transactions such as spin-offs and stock splits), without stockholder approval.

þ
Do require significant stock ownership by our NEOs.
ý
No speculative trading, hedging, or derivatives transactions in Company stock is permitted by employees.

þ
Do permit clawbacks of compensation from NEOs in the event of certain financial restatements.
ý
No separate benefit plans for NEOs - NEOs participate in the same benefit plans available to other full time employees.

þ
Do limit perquisites.

ý
No evergreen provisions in our equity plan.
þ
Do grant performance-vesting awards.



27


Key Elements of our Executive Compensation Program
Link to Program ObjectivesType of CompensationKey Features
Base SalaryCompensation Committee considers base salaries paid by companies for comparable roles of the general industry data, offering market competitive fixed compensation.CashProvides a minimum level of guaranteed pay.
Annual Incentive
Incentive Compensation Plan
A cash-based award that rewards short‑term operating and financial performance.CashTarget incentive opportunity is set as a percentage of base salary and is granted only if threshold performance levels are met.
Long-Term Incentive
Stock options or AO LTIP units
Helps ensure that executive pay is directly linked to the achievement of the Company’s long-term objectives and promotes retention.
Long-Term
Equity
Four-year vesting promotes retention; NEOs only receive value if stock price rises.
Long-Term Incentive
Performance-vesting restricted stock
or
Performance-vesting FV LTIP units
Links compensation of executives to the building of long-term stockholder value, balances short-term operating focus, and aligns the long-term financial interests of executive management with those of our stockholders.
Long-Term
Equity
Designed to reward executives for attainment of specified long-term stockholder value creation goals (e.g., TSR); value is linked to stock price.

The Compensation Committee designs each of the elements of compensation for the NEOs to further the goals and policies set forth above and to support and enhance the Company’s business strategy. The Committee considers all elements of the Company’s executive compensation program holistically rather than each compensation element individually.

In 2015, over 89% of the votes cast approved the compensation for our NEOs described in our Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

An officer’s target compensation is not mechanically set to be a particular percentage of the peer group average; however, the Compensation Committee does review the officer’s compensation relative to the peer group to help the Compensation Committee perform the subjective analysis described above. Peer group data is not used as the determining factor in setting compensation for the following reasons: (a) the officer’s role and experience within the Company may be different from the role and experience of comparable officers at the peer companies; (b) the average actual compensation for comparable officers at the peer companies may be the result of a year of over performance or under performance by the peer group and individual peers; and (c) the Compensation Committee believes that ultimately the decision as to appropriate target compensation for a particular officer should be made based on the full review described above.

The Company does not have specific, proportionate ratios to define the relative total compensation between the individual NEOs, although the Compensation Committee from time to time does review the relationship in pay between executive officers to assure that relative compensation levels are appropriate and are designed to effectively motivate and retain executives.

In setting the total compensation of our NEOs, the Compensation Committee considers, for each NEO, the approximate proportions of the different elements of total compensation that would be earned if compensation targets were achieved.

The allocation between base salary, short‑term cash incentives and long‑term equity incentives is determined by the Compensation Committee based upon its general consideration of the executive’s level within our organization. At the more senior levels, less of an officer’s total compensation is fixed and more is variable (i.e., in the form of cash awards and long‑term equity awards).

28



In determining the base salary and the threshold, target, and maximum short‑term cash incentives and long‑term equity incentives for each NEO for a given year, the Compensation Committee generally considers a number of factors on a subjective basis, including:
ŸScope of the officer’s responsibilities within the Company and in relation to comparable officers at various companies within the peer group referred to above;
ŸExperience of the officer within our industry and at the Company;
ŸPerformance of the named executive officer and his or her contribution to the Company;
ŸCompany’s financial budget and general level of wage increases throughout the Company for the coming year;
ŸReview of historical compensation information for the individual officer;
ŸSubjective determination of the compensation needed to motivate and retain that individual;
ŸRecommendations of the Chief Executive Officer; and
ŸData regarding compensation paid to officers with comparable titles, positions or responsibilities at REITs that are considered by the Compensation Committee to be comparable for these purposes.
Analysis of 2015 Compensation

Base Salary

Base salary amounts are based on an evaluation of each executive officer’s experience, position and responsibility, as well as competitive pay levels, general economic conditions and other factors deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee. Base salaries for 2014, 2015, and 2016 were not increased from the amounts set in 2011. The base salaries for each NEO are as follows:
Base Salary
NEO20142015% Change
Sandeep Mathrani$1,200,000$1,200,0000%
Michael B. Berman$750,000$750,0000%
Shobi Khan$750,000$750,0000%
Alan J. Barocas$750,000$750,0000%
Richard S. Pesin$750,000$750,0000%

Incentive Compensation Plan

The annual incentive component of compensation is designed to align executive officer pay with short‑term financial results that the Compensation Committee believes will yield long‑term stockholder value. In April 2011, the Compensation Committee approved the Incentive Compensation Plan to promote the growth in value of the Company. The Incentive Compensation Plan provides an annual cash award based on the achievement of performance goals determined by the Compensation Committee based on specific goals that are employee focused, financial focused, relationship focused and performance focused, as described more fully below, and such other standards as the Compensation Committee determines to be appropriate. The Incentive Compensation Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee, which may delegate administration of the Incentive Compensation Plan to the Chief Executive Officer.

Under the Incentive Compensation Plan, each NEO has a stated target cash award opportunity and a maximum opportunity that shall not exceed two times the target amount. With the exception of Mr. Mathrani, none of our NEOs were eligible for a guaranteed cash award for performance in 2015. Mr. Mathrani’s employment contract guarantees Mr. Mathrani a minimum cash award of $2,000,000 for each of the 2015 and 2016 calendar years.

The following table shows the target annual incentive cash award for 2015 performance for each of our NEOs and the actual award earned, in each case expressed as a percentage of base salary and as a dollar amount.

29


NEOTarget Annual Cash Award
(as a % of Base Salary)
Target Annual Cash Award Amount
($)
Annual Cash Award Received
(as a % of Base Salary)
Amount of Cash Award Received
Sandeep Mathrani250%$3,000,000250%$3,000,000
Michael B. Berman100%$750,000107%$800,000
Shobi Khan100%$750,000107%$800,000
Alan J. Barocas100%$750,000107%$800,000
Richard S. Pesin100%$750,000107%$800,000

In February 2015, the Compensation Committee established objectives for Mr. Mathrani for 2015. The following discussion identifies the objectives and describes the progress that was made in achieving those objectives during 2015. The Compensation Committee assessed the achievement of these objectives in February 2016. The objectives related to operating performance, financial performance and achievement of certain corporate goals:

Our operating objectives included (i) increasing mall portfolio permanent occupancy to at least 93.5% and (ii) achieving initial suite-to-suite lease spreads of at least 10.0% for leases commencing in 2015. Permanent occupancy reached 92.3%, with 8.9 million square feet leased, in line with our total occupancy plan of 96.5%, and suite-to-suite lease spreads on leases commencing in 2015 were 10.8% representing 4.8 million square feet of leased space.

Our financial performance objectives included achieving (i) EBITDA of $2.124 billion; (ii) FFO of $1.371 billion and (iii) FFO per share of $1.43. For 2015, EBITDA was $2.118 billion; FFO was $1.377 billion; and FFO per share was $1.44.

Our corporate objectives included (i) adding $300-$500 million to the development pipeline; (ii) identifying at least $1.0 billion in value creating opportunities; (iii) updating succession plans; and (iv) recommending revisions to the executive compensation plan to the Compensation Committee. In 2015, management added $206 million to the development pipeline; identified $480 million in value creation through acquisitions, development projects, solar projects and share repurchases; updated succession plans for each member of the senior management team; and recommended changes to the executive compensation plan to the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee assessed Mr. Mathrani’s performance based on the progress towards achieving the established objectives set forth above. In making its assessment, the Compensation Committee noted certain retailer bankruptcies occurred during 2015 that reduced EBITDA and FFO by approximately $20 million, FFO per share by approximately $0.02 and permanent occupancy by 1.2%. On the basis of the assessment described above, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Mathrani a cash award of $3,000,000, representing 100% of his target cash award, which target cash award represents 250% of his base salary for 2015.

With the input of Mr. Mathrani, the Compensation Committee also reviewed the performance of the Company’s other executive officers, including the other NEOs, against the set of objectives listed above, to the extent applicable to the executive officer, as summarized below.
Incentive Compensation Plan - NEO Objectives
NEO2015 Objectives
Michael B. BermanEBITDA, FFO, FFO per share, identifying value creation, and succession planning
Shobi KhanEBITDA, FFO, FFO per share, identifying value creation, succession planning, permanent occupancy and suite-to-suite lease spreads
Alan J. BarocasEBITDA, FFO, FFO per share, identifying value creation, succession planning, permanent occupancy and suite-to-suite lease spreads
Richard S. PesinEBITDA, FFO, FFO per share, development pipeline, identifying value creation, and succession planning

On the basis of the assessments of the goals described above, the Compensation Committee awarded each of Messrs. Berman, Khan, Barocas and Pesin a cash award of $800,000, representing 107% of their target cash award, which target cash award represents 100% of their base salary for 2015.


30


Long-Term Incentive Awards

On October 27, 2010, the Company adopted the form of the Equity Plan, which provides for grants of stock‑based awards and performance‑based compensation to directors, officers and other employees of the Company. The plan was amended November 12, 2013, to provide for grants of AO and FV LTIP units. The purpose of the equity awards is to attract, retain and motivate the Company’s directors, officers and employees by providing them with a proprietary interest in the Company’s long‑term success or compensation based on the attainment of performance goals.
Long-Term Compensation Program Objectives:
Ÿ
Reward achievement over a multi-year period;

Ÿ
Focus executives on the total stockholder return of the Company, which together with our stock ownership guidelines, aligns the interests of executives with those of our stockholders; and

Ÿ
Provide a retention mechanism through multi-year vesting.


The Committee oversees grants of the awards. The Committee determines the target grant amounts for each executive using factors similar to those used in setting annual incentive targets, including the executive’s experience, level of responsibility within the Company and internal and external equity considerations.

2015 Updates to Awards under the Equity Plan

For 2015 performance, equity awards included grants of AO and performance-vesting FV LTIP units. LTIP units are a class of partnership interest in the Operating Partnership and are used as a form of equity-based award for annual long-term incentive equity compensation. LTIP units are designed to qualify as “profits interests” in the Operating Partnership for federal income tax purposes. FV LTIP units initially are not economically equivalent in value to a share of our common stock, but over time can increase in value upon the occurrence of specified events to achieve an approximately one-for-one parity with common stock by operation of tax rules. Until and unless such parity is reached, the value that an NEO will realize for a given number of vested FV LTIP units is less than the value of an equal number of shares of common stock. Assuming certain conditions are met, FV LTIP units are convertible at the election of the holder into an equivalent number of common units of the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”), which are redeemable by the holder for approximately one common share of the Company or the cash value of such shares, at the Company’s option.

Following the completion of last year’s stockholder meeting, GGP sought and received feedback from its stockholders regarding the Company’s compensation programs. Based on this feedback, GGP redesigned its approach to long-term incentive compensation by more closely tying the executives’ compensation to stockholder value creation. The Committee now grants long-term incentives through four equity vehicles:

Stock options and AO LTIP units (which are designed to be comparable to stock options): These awards help the Company retain executives and focus attention on longer-term performance. Stock options and AO LTIP units vest ratably over four years (25% of award vests on each anniversary of the award date). For stock options, no dividends are paid until the options are exercised and converted to held shares. For AO LTIP units, a distribution equal to10% of the dividend is paid currently, and executives receive value only if they increase the stock price and deliver value to stockholders.

Performance-vesting restricted stock and performance-vesting FV LTIP units: These awards provide an incentive to achieve long-term financial objectives, as they only vest if specified performance objectives are achieved. Performance-vesting awards cliff-vest after three years. The total number of shares earned depends on how GGP performs relative to peers and on an absolute basis versus pre-established performance goals. To maximize alignment with stockholders, 75% of the performance-vesting awards vest based on how GGP’s TSR performs relative to its peers and relative to pre-established total return goals. The final 25% of the performance-vesting awards vest based on GGP’s FFO per diluted share performance.


31


The following table provides a detailed summary of the performance-vesting restricted stock and performance-vesting FV LTIP unit awards. Payouts between threshold and target are calculated using straight-line interpolation. For performance-vesting FV LTIP units, a distribution per unit is paid currently equivalent to approximately 10% of the dividend per share paid on the Company’s common stock, and additional FV LTIP units are issued at the time of the grant approximately equal in value to an estimate of 90% of dividends to be paid over the performance period. The additional FV LTIP units issued in lieu of dividends are subject to forfeiture if performance goals are not met or if the value of dividends actually paid during the performance period is less than the value of such units.

2015 Long-Term Incentive Awards
 Performance-Vesting FV LTIP Units
Performance MeasureWeighting
Threshold
(50% payout)
Target
(100% payout)
Above Target
(100% payout and discretionary award*)
Relative TSR
(FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index)
25%
25th percentile
50th percentile
> 50th percentile
Relative TSR
(FTSE NAREIT Retail REIT Index)
25%
25th percentile
50th percentile
> 50th percentile
Absolute TSR25%3% CAGR7% CAGR> 7% CAGR
FFO per diluted share25%3% CAGR7% CAGR> 7% CAGR
* Additional awards for above target performance may be granted at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

2015 Grant for 2014 Performance

In January 2015, upon review of the objectives established for 2014, the Committee granted each NEO an equity award for 2014 performance. As these awards were delivered prior to implementing the enhancements to our LTIP, each NEO had the choice of receiving his 2014 award in the form of restricted stock, stock options, FV LTIP units, or AO LTIP units. Each NEO elected to receive FV LTIP units. These FV LTIP units vest over four years in 25% increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
 January 2015 Equity Awards for 2014 Performance*
NEONumber of FV LTIP UnitsValue
Sandeep Mathrani343,997$9,999,992
Michael B. Berman85,999$2,499,991
Shobi Khan77,399$2,249,989
Alan J. Barocas60,200$1,750,014
Richard S. Pesin60,200$1,750,014
*Each executive received an award of FV LTIP units on January 6, 2015. The number of FV LTIP units granted to each executive was based on a FV LTIP unit value of $29.07 on the date of grant, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

32


2016 Grant for 2015 Performance

In February 2016, upon review of the objectives described above for determining awards under the Incentive Compensation Plan, the Committee granted each NEO an equity award for 2015 performance comprised of (i) at each NEO’s election, 50% of the value of the award in either performance-vesting restricted stock or performance-vesting FV LTIP units, and (ii) at each NEO’s election, 50% of the value of the award in either stock options or AO LTIP units. All NEOs elected to receive performance-vesting FV LTIP units and AO LTIP units. The following table shows each NEO’s equity incentive award for 2015 performance granted on February 18, 2016.
February 2016 Equity Awards for 2015 Performance
NEO
Value of AO LTIP Units
(1)
Number of AO LTIP Units GrantedValue of Performance LTIP Units (1)Aggregate Number of Performance-vesting LTIP Units Granted (2)Total Value of LTIP Awards Granted
Sandeep Mathrani$4,250,000
826,848
$4,250,000
257,944
$8,500,000
Michael B. Berman$1,250,000
243,191
$1,250,000
75,867
$2,500,000
Shobi Khan$1,500,000
291,829
$1,500,000
91,038
$3,000,000
Alan J. Barocas$875,000
170,233
$875,000
53,106
$1,750,000
Richard S. Pesin$875,000
170,233
$875,000
53,106
$1,750,000
(1)Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, disregarding for this purpose the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting condition. The grant date fair value for AO LTIP units was calculated using Black-Scholes and assumes volatility of 25%, an annual dividend yield of 3.07%, a risk-free investment rate of 1.52%, and an expected term of 6.25 years. Grant date fair values for FV LTIP units that vest on achievement of Relative Equity REIT TSR, Relative Retail REIT TSR and Absolute TSR targets were calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. The simulations were conducted using assumptions regarding the total stock return on the Company's common stock and the relative total returns of the FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index and FTSE NAREIT Retail REIT Index, as applicable, as well as other factors. The simulations used an expected volatility of 20% and a risk-free investment rate of 0.86%. The grant date fair value for LTIP units that vest on achievement of FFO targets is equal to the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant, adjusted for the conversion ratio of OP units to common stock and book up risk of LTIP units.

(2)Amounts represent the aggregate number of units each NEO would receive if the target was achieved for each performance measure. Performance-vesting LTIP units are subject to forfeiture if performance measures are not met, the NEO does not continue to serve through the vesting date, or the units do not otherwise vest.

The following table shows the number of performance-vesting LTIP units granted to each NEO that would be earned if the target was achieved for each of the performance measures and assumes each NEO continues to serve through the end of the performance period. The totals also include additional LTIP units granted in lieu of 90% of the distributions expected to be payable on FV LTIP units during the performance period, which to be earned require achievement of performance objectives and are subject to forfeiture if dividends actually paid on the Company's common stock during the performance period do not meet expectations.

February 2016 Performance-Vesting LTIP Units
Performance MeasureNumber of Units
Sandeep MathraniMichael B. BermanShobi KhanAlan J. BarocasRichard S. Pesin
Relative Equity REIT TSR52,62015,47718,57210,83310,833
Relative Retail REIT TSR62,77918,46522,15712,92612,926
Absolute TSR97,46528,66634,39920,06620,066
FFO45,08013,25915,9109,2819,281
Total257,94475,86791,03853,10653,106

33


2015 Total Compensation

In order to provide our stockholders with a more complete picture of the compensation of our NEOs that is consistent with the way the Compensation Committee views our compensation program, we are providing supplemental compensation information not required by the SEC. The table below shows each NEO’s salary, cash award, and annual long-term equity incentive award value for services performed in 2015. This table, in contrast to the Summary Compensation Table on page 36, includes equity awards granted in February 2016 for services performed in 2015, excludes equity awards granted in January 2015 for services performed in 2014, and, for Mr. Mathrani, includes the annualized value of the FV LTIP unit award granted pursuant to his 2015 employment agreement.

Total Compensation
NEOBase SalaryIncentive Compensation Plan AwardLong-Term Incentive Award Value*Annualized Value of One-time Long-term Incentive Award**Total Compensation
Sandeep Mathrani$1,200,000
$3,000,000
$8,500,000
$5,000,000
$17,700,000
Michael B. Berman$750,000
$800,000
$2,500,000
N/A
$4,050,000
Shobi Khan$750,000
$800,000
$3,000,000
N/A
$4,550,000
Alan J. Barocas$750,000
$800,000
$1,750,000
N/A
$3,300,000
Richard S. Pesin$750,000
$800,000
$1,750,000
N/A
$3,300,000
* These amounts represent the grant date fair value of the AO LTIP unit awards and performance-vesting FV LTIP unit awards granted on February 18, 2016 for 2015 performance, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

** Represents one fifth of Mr. Mathrani’s FV LTIP unit award granted in February 2015 pursuant to his employment agreement.

Equity Grant Practices

We prohibit insider trading and require pre‑clearance by the Company’s Chief Legal Officer or Corporate Secretary in connection with any purchase, sale or similar transaction to be made in any of the Company’s securities by directors, executive officers, designated employees or their respective family members. Further, we prohibit aggressive and speculative trading in, or hedging of, our securities by our officers, directors and employees and their respective family members, including, but not limited to, short sales of GGP stock, or the purchase or sale of options, puts, calls, straddles, equity swaps or other derivative securities that are directly linked to GGP stock. Except as described with respect to Mr. Mathrani’s initial grant of options in 2010, the exercise price of each stock option awarded under our equity plans is the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. Equity awards are subject to the Company’s Clawback Policy described above.

Retirement Benefits

The Company does not provide any defined benefit pension benefits or supplemental pension benefits to executive officers.

Other Benefits

Our executive officers have the option to participate in various employee benefit programs, including medical and dental benefit programs. These benefit programs are generally available to all employees of the Company whose customary employment is more than 20 hours per week. We also provide these employees, including our executive officers, with the opportunity to purchase our common stock through payroll deductions at a 15% discount through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which was approved by our stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting.

Perquisites

Except in very limited circumstances, the Company’s executive officers do not receive perquisites or other benefits that are not available to all of the Company’s employees. See the “All Other Compensation Table” below for more information on perquisites.


34


Impact of Regulatory Requirements on Compensation

Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee considered the anticipated tax treatment to the Company and our executive officers of various payments and benefits. The Compensation Committee determined not to limit executive compensation to that deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Compensation Committee will monitor the impact to the Company and consider whether any changes in the Company’s programs are warranted. However, the Compensation Committee may continue to approve compensation that does not meet the requirements of Section 162(m) if necessary to attract new hires or to ensure competitive levels of total compensation for the executive officers.

Compensation Committee Report

We, the undersigned members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of GGP, have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on our review and consultation with management, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and in GGP’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015.



J. Bruce Flatt (Chair)
Mary Lou Fiala
John K. Haley

35


COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information on the compensation of the Company’s NEOs for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013.
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary
($)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)(1)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
Option
Awards
($)(2)
All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
Total
($)
Sandeep Mathrani20151,200,0003,000,00034,999,984

47,574
39,247,558
Chief Executive Officer20141,200,0003,000,000

692,039
4,892,039
 20131,200,0003,000,000
17,322,000
580,608
22,102,608
Michael B. Berman2015750,000800,0002,499,991

14,000
4,063,991
Executive Vice President2014750,000750,000

27,084
1,527,084
and Chief Financial Officer2013750,0001,000,000
5,482,736
37,934
7,270,670
Shobi Khan2015750,000800,0002,249,989

14,000
3,813,989
Executive Vice President2014750,000750,000

14,750
1,514,750
and Chief Operating Officer2013750,0001,000,000
5,061,948
20,100
6,832,048
Alan J. Barocas2015750,000800,0001,750,014

14,000
3,314,014
Senior Executive Vice2014750,000750,000

14,750
1,514,750
President, Leasing2013750,0001,000,000
3,162,155
20,100
4,932,255
Richard S. Pesin2015750,000800,0001,750,014

14,000
3,314,014
Executive Vice President,2014750,000750,000

16,750
1,516,750
Anchors, Development and2013750,0001,000,000
3,162,155
16,800
4,928,955
Construction       
        
(1)Cash awards earned for 2015 were paid in February 2016. Cash awards earned for 2014 were paid in January 2015. Cash awards earned for 2013 were paid in January 2014. See the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above for a description of the Company’s Incentive Compensation Plan.

(2)Each NEO received an award of AO LTIP units and performance-vesting FV LTIP units in February 2016 for 2015 performance. Mr. Mathrani received a one-time award of FV LTIP units valued at $25,000,000 in January 2015, pursuant to his employment agreement.

Each NEO received an award of FV LTIP units in January 2015 for 2014 performance. None of our NEOs were granted equity awards in 2014.     

Each NEO received two equity awards in 2013. The first award was granted in January 2013 for 2012 performance. The second award was granted in November 2013 for 2013 performance. The 2013 “Option Awards” amounts in the Summary Compensation Table equal the sum of both awards for each NEO. None of our NEOs were granted equity incentive awards in 2012.

FV LTIPs are reported in the Stock Awards column. AO LTIPs are reported in the Option Awards column. Equity award amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in the footnote “Stock‑Based Compensation Plans” included in the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

See the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above for additional information on the equity incentive awards.

(3)Refer to the table below for a description of the components of the “All Other Compensation” column for fiscal years 2013, 2014, and 2015.

36


All Other Compensation Table
NameYear
401(k)
Matching
Contribution
($)
Sum of
Dividends on
Restricted
Stock
($)
Relocation
Expenses($)
Other
($)
Total
($)
Sandeep Mathrani201513,2500

34,324
(1) 
47,574
 201413,000600,000

79,039
(1) 
692,039
 201312,750480,000

87,858
(1) 
580,608
Michael B. Berman201513,2500

750
(2) 
14,000
 201413,00012,334

1,750
(3) 
27,084
 201312,75017,834

7,350
(4) 
37,934
Shobi Khan201513,250

750
(2) 
14,000
 201413,000

1,750
(3) 
14,750
 201312,750

7,350
(4) 
20,100
Alan J. Barocas201513,250

750
(2) 
14,000
 201413,000

1,750
(3) 
14,750
 201312,750

7,350
(4) 
20,100
Richard S. Pesin201513,250

750
(2) 
14,000
 201413,000

3,750
(5) 
16,750
 201312,750

4,050
(6) 
16,800

(1)Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Mathrani’s 2010 Employment Agreement, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Mathrani’s life insurance coverage premiums for the duration of his employment period which totaled $14,460 for 2015, $13,380 for 2014, and $12,572 for 2013. This amount also includes allocations to Mr. Mathrani in each of 2015, 2014, and 2013 for personal use of a car leased by the Company ($19,114, $5,637, and $5,669, respectively), utilization of an assistant’s time for personal purposes in each of 2014 and 2013 ($58,272, and $62,267, respectively), and dividends related to preferred stock of certain GGP REIT subsidiaries in 2015, 2014, and 2013 ($750, $750, and $850 respectively). Additionally, he was awarded preferred stock of certain GGP REIT subsidiaries valued at $1,000 in 2014 and $6,500 in 2013.

(2)Amount represents $750 of dividends related to preferred stock of certain GGP REIT subsidiaries.

(3)Amount represents $750 of dividends related to preferred stock of certain GGP REIT subsidiaries and $1,000 from awards of preferred stock of certain GGP REIT subsidiaries.

(4)Amount represents $850 of dividends related to preferred stock of certain GGP REIT subsidiaries and $6,500 from awards of preferred stock of certain GGP REIT subsidiaries.

(5)Amount represents $750 of dividends related to preferred stock of certain GGP REIT subsidiaries and $3,000 from awards of preferred stock of certain GGP REIT subsidiaries.

(6)Amount represents $550 of dividends related to preferred stock of certain GGP REIT subsidiaries and $3,500 from awards of preferred stock of certain GGP REIT subsidiaries.


37


Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended 2015
The following table provides information on incentive awards made to the NEOs in 2015. These incentive awards were made pursuant to the Incentive Compensation Plan and the Equity Plan, which are described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” Actual amounts paid under the Incentive Compensation Plan for 2015 are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 36.
NameGrant DateEstimated Future Payouts Under
Non‑Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or Units
(2)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Exercise or
Base Price of
Option
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option
Threshold($)
Target
($)
Maximum($)
Units
(#)
Options
(#)
Awards
($/Sh)
Awards
($)
Sandeep Mathrani02/12/15



848,608


24,999,992
 01/06/15



343,997


9,999,993
 

3,000,000
6,000,000




Michael B. Berman01/06/15



85,999


2,499,991
 

750,000
1,500,000




Shobi Khan01/06/15



77,399


2,249,989
 

750,000
1,500,000




Alan J. Barocas01/06/15



60,200


1,750,014
 

750,000
1,500,000




Richard S. Pesin01/06/15



60,200


1,750,014
 

750,000
1,500,000





(1)Under the terms of the Incentive Compensation Plan, the percentage of each executive’s target award payable is based on the corresponding percentage of Budget EBITDA Achieved (as defined in the Incentive Compensation Plan) in the chart below.
 Percentage of
Budget EBITDA Achieved
Percentage of
Target Award
Threshold90%0%
Target100%100%
Maximum≥110%200%

In the event the Percentage of Budget EBITDA Achieved is between two levels, the amount to be distributed shall be calculated on a straight line interpolation basis between the two levels. All three payout scenarios assume that no discretion is exercised to increase or decrease the executive’s payout. Notwithstanding the exercise of discretion, no executive may receive more than 200% of his Target Award under the Incentive Compensation Plan.

(2)Represents FV LTIP units granted pursuant to the Equity Plan. The January 6, 2015 grants were for 2014 performance and vest over four years in 25% increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vest in full on January 6, 2019. Mr. Mathrani's February 12, 2015 grant was made pursuant to the 2015 Employment Agreement and cliff-vests in full on January 1, 2020.


38


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year‑End 2015
The following table provides information concerning the number and value of outstanding stock options and restricted stock held by the NEOs at December 31, 2015.
NameOption AwardsStock Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($) (10)
Sandeep Mathrani2,000,000(1)
 9.6910/27/2020
 
 705,882 176,471
(2)14.768/2/2021
 
 560,000 840,000
(3)19.241/7/2023
 
 1,000,000 1,000,000
(4)20.6111/12/2023
 
       343,997
(8)9,732,341
       848,608
(9)24,008,762
Michael B. Berman80,000 80,000
(5)13.8112/15/2021
 
 189,473 284,211
(3)19.241/7/2023
 
 300,000 300,000
(4)20.6111/12/2023
 
       85,999
(8)2,433,078
Shobi Khan320,000 80,000
(6)15.276/13/2021
 
 320,000 80,000
(2)14.768/2/2021
 
 157,894 236,843
(3)19.241/7/2023
 
 300,000 300,000
(4)20.6111/12/2023
 
       77,399
(8) 2,189,767
Alan J. Barocas200,000 
(7)14.111/24/2021
 
 320,000 80,000
(2)14.768/2/2021
 
 126,315 189,474
(3)19.241/7/2023
 
 150,000 150,000
(4)20.6111/12/2023
 
       60,200
(8)1,703,174
Richard S. Pesin400,000 
(7)14.111/24/2021
 
 320,000 80,000
(2)14.768/2/2021
 
 126,315 189,474
(3)19.241/7/2023
 
 150,000 150,000
(4)20.6111/12/2023
 
       60,200
(8)1,703,174
(1)Represents options granted pursuant to the Equity Plan on October 27, 2010. These options vested over four years in 25% increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vested in full on October 27, 2014.

(2)Represents options granted pursuant to the Equity Plan on August 2, 2011. These options vest over five years in 20% increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vest in full on August 2, 2016.

(3)Represents options granted pursuant to the Equity Plan on January 7, 2013. These options vest over five years in 20% increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vest in full on January 7, 2018.

(4)Represents options granted pursuant to the Equity Plan on November 12, 2013. These options vest over four years in 25% increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vest in full on November 12, 2017.

(5)Represents options granted pursuant to the Equity Plan on December 15, 2011. These options vest over five years in 20% increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vest in full on December 15, 2016.

(6)Represents options granted pursuant to the Equity Plan on June 13, 2011. These options vest over five years in 20% increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vest in full on June 13, 2016.

(7)Represents options granted pursuant to the Equity Plan on January 24, 2011. These options vest over four years in 25% increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vested in full on January 24, 2015.

39



(8)Represents FV LTIP units granted pursuant to the Equity Plan on January 6, 2015. These units vest over four years in 25% increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and vest in full on January 6, 2019.

(9)Represents FV LTIPs granted pursuant to the Equity Plan on February 12, 2015, which cliff-vest in full on January 1, 2020.

(10)The amounts are calculated by multiplying $27.21, the closing price of our common stock as reported by the NYSE for December 31, 2015, by the applicable number of FV LTIP units, multiplied by the conversion ratio of OP Units into common stock of 1.0397624.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year Ended 2015

The following table provides information on option exercises under all plans during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 by each of the NEOs and restricted stock that vested during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
NameOption AwardsStock Awards
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
Value
Realized
on Exercise
($)(1)
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)
Sandeep Mathrani



Michael B. Berman80,000
954,400


Shobi Khan



Alan J. Barocas200,000
3,190,000


Richard S. Pesin




(1)Amounts represent the difference between the closing price per share of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of exercise and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of options exercised.


40


Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control
On October 27, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Mathrani (the “2010 Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Mathrani agreed to serve, for an initial five-year term commencing on January 17, 2011, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Under Mr. Mathrani’s 2010 Employment Agreement, if the Company terminated Mr. Mathrani’s employment without “cause” or did not renew the 2010 Employment Agreement following the initial term, or if Mr. Mathrani terminated his employment for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the 2010 Employment Agreement), then Mr. Mathrani would be eligible to receive:
2 years of salary continuation;

2 times his annual cash award for the previous year;

pro rata annual cash award for the year of termination (based on his annual cash award for the previous year);

full vesting of the awards described below under “Employment Arrangements for Executive Officers”; and

2 years of welfare benefit continuation.

If Mr. Mathrani’s employment was terminated due to death or disability, then Mr. Mathrani would have been eligible to receive a pro rata annual cash award for the year of termination (based on his annual cash award for the previous year) and full vesting of all awards.
On February 12, 2015, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Mathrani (the “2015 Employment Agreement”) for an initial five-year term commencing on January 1, 2015 with substantially the same terms as the 2010 Employment Agreement, except that (1) annual awards granted to Mr. Mathrani will be in the form of stock options, restricted stock or LTIP units, at the election of Mr. Mathrani, (2) Mr. Mathrani’s annual awards commencing with the 2015 fiscal year and the LTIP units granted on February 12, 2015 vest upon a change of control, and (3) Mr. Mathrani’s target annual cash award was set at $3,000,000.
All of the Company’s executive officers, except for Mr. Mathrani, are “at-will” employees and none would have been entitled to payment of any benefits or automatic early vesting of awards as a result of a change in control of the Company on December 31, 2015. Although the NEOs described in this section, except for Mr. Mathrani, are at-will employees, each one is eligible to receive severance payments if his employment is terminated by us “without cause”:
For Mr. Khan, the severance payment is equal to his annual base salary plus a pro rata annual cash award for the year of termination (based on the target cash award for the current year).

For Messrs. Barocas and Pesin, the severance payment is equal to six months of the officer’s annual base salary plus a pro rata annual cash award for the year of termination (based on the target cash award for the current year).

For Mr. Berman, if terminated by us “without cause” prior to the vesting of his initial award of 400,000 stock options, which occurs on December 15, 2016, he is eligible to receive the following benefits:

a severance payment equal to two years’ base salary and two times his target cash award for the current year; and

80,000 stock options of his initial award of 400,000 stock options shall vest on the termination date.

41


For awards granted during 2015 and earlier, under the Equity Plan, (1) in the event of a termination of service due to death, disability or retirement, any unvested equity awards immediately terminate and, in the case of stock options and AO LTIP units, the vested portion remains exercisable until the earlier of three years following such termination of service or the expiration of any such awards; (2) in the event of a termination of service for any other reason, any unvested equity awards immediately terminate and, in the case of stock options and AO LTIP units, the vested portion remains exercisable until the earlier of one year following such termination of service or the expiration of any such awards; and (3) upon a change of control of the Company, the Compensation Committee may make adjustments to the terms and conditions of outstanding awards in its discretion, including, acceleration of vesting and exercisability of awards, substitution of awards with substantially similar awards and cancellation of awards for fair value.
For awards granted beginning in 2016, under the Equity Plan, (1) in the event of a termination of service due to death, disability, or retirement, time-vesting awards vest immediately and performance-vesting awards remain outstanding through the end of the performance period, and the number of units that vests equal the number that would been earned had such termination not occurred, and in the case of stock options and AO LTIP units, the vested portion remains exercisable until the earlier of three years following such termination of service or the expiration of any such awards, and provided that "retirement" means the retirement from active employment at or after age 60 and completing 10 years of service with the Company, and such vesting in connection with retirement is subject to approval of the Chief Executive Officer; (2) in the event of a termination of service due to a resignation, any unvested equity awards immediately terminate, and in the case of stock options and AO LTIP units, the vested portion remains exercisable until the earlier of 30 days following such termination of service or the expiration of any such awards; (3)  in the event of a termination of service for any other reason, any unvested equity awards immediately terminate, and in the case of stock options and AO LTIP units, the vested portion remains exercisable until the earlier of one year following such termination of service or the expiration of any such awards; and (4) upon a change in control of the Company, the Compensation Committee may make adjustments to the terms and conditions of outstanding time-vesting awards in its discretion, including, acceleration of vesting and exercisability of awards, substitution of awards with substantially similar awards and cancellation of awards for fair value, and performance-vesting awards are earned at 100% of target level subject to vesting based on continued service through the vesting date or immediate vesting upon a termination without "cause" or for "good reason", as such terms are defined in the award agreements.
None of our NEOs are entitled to payment of any benefits in connection with a termination “for cause.” In the event of a “for cause” termination, all equity awards, including the vested portion, issued under the Equity Plan are forfeited.
The following table illustrates the payments that we estimate would be payable to each of our NEOs on termination of employment under each of the circumstances described in the table, or upon a change of control, assuming such event occurred on December 31, 2015. The amounts shown are estimates and do not necessarily reflect the actual amounts that these individuals would receive on termination of employment or change of control. Amounts assume LTIP units have been fully booked up. The value of early vesting of awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2015 of $27.21. The value of early vesting of stock options is based on the difference between this closing price and the option exercise price. The value of early vesting of FV LTIPs is calculated using a conversion ratio of OP Units into common stock of 1.0397624.


42


Estimated Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change of Control on December 31, 2015
NameCash
Severance
Pro rata
Cash Award
Early Vesting
of Awards
Excise Tax Gross-UpWelfare
Benefits
Total
Sandeep Mathrani:
Termination by the Company Without Cause
or
by Mr. Mathrani for Good Reason

$8,400,000

$3,000,000
$49,232,967
(1) 

 $49,612
(2) 

$60,682,579
Termination due to Death or Disability

$3,000,000
$49,232,967
(1) 

 
 
$52,232,967
Change in Control

$33,741,103
(3) 

(4) 

 
$33,741,103
Michael Berman:
Termination by the Company Without Cause
$3,000,000

$1,072,000
(5) 
  
 
$4,072,000
Shobi Khan:
Termination by the Company Without Cause
$750,000

$750,000

   
 
$1,500,000
Alan Barocas:
Termination by the Company Without Cause
$375,000

$750,000

   
 
$1,125,000
Richard Pesin:
Termination by the Company Without Cause
$375,000

$750,000

   
 
$1,125,000
(1)This amount represents full vesting of options to purchase 176,471 shares of common stock at $14.76 per share ($2,197,064), full vesting of options to purchase 840,000 shares of common stock at $19.24 per share ($6,694,800), full vesting of options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at $20.61 per share ($6,600,000), to the extent unvested and full vesting of 1,192,605 FV LTIP units.

(2)This amount represents the estimated value of two years of welfare benefit continuation.

(3)This amount represents full vesting of 1,192,605 FV LTIP units.

(4)Pursuant to Mr. Mathrani's 2015 Employment Agreement, the Company has agreed to reimburse Mr. Mathrani for certain excise taxes under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, as well as any income and excise taxes payable by Mr. Mathrani as a result of any reimbursements for such taxes, resulting from a Change in Control of the Company. No such reimbursements would have been payable to Mr. Mathrani had a Change in Control occurred on December 31, 2015.

(5)This amount represents full vesting of options to purchase 80,000 shares of common stock at $13.81 per share.


43


Employment Arrangements for Executive Officers
The following is a summary of the Company’s employment agreements or arrangements with the NEOs.
Sandeep Mathrani. On October 27, 2010, the Company and Mr. Mathrani entered into the 2010 Employment Agreement, pursuant to which Mr. Mathrani agreed to serve, for an initial five‑year term commencing on January 17, 2011, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The 2010 Employment Agreement provided for an annual base salary of $1,200,000 and a target annual cash award of $1,500,000. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the 2010 Employment Agreement, (i) the Company granted to Mr. Mathrani an award of 1,500,000 shares of restricted common stock, which, as amended, vests over four years from the Grant Date, and (ii) pursuant to a non‑qualified stock option award agreement, on October 27, 2010, the Company granted to Mr. Mathrani an award of options to acquire 2,000,000 shares of common stock, which vests over four years from the Grant Date. The options have an exercise price of $9.69 per share. The restricted stock and options were awarded pursuant and subject to the terms and conditions of the Equity Plan. Commencing in 2012, Mr. Mathrani became entitled to receive, on an annual basis, at his election, either options to purchase an additional number of shares of common stock equal to five times his previous year’s annual base salary, divided by the then current trading price of common stock, or shares of restricted stock of equivalent value (based on the Black Scholes pricing model).
On February 12, 2015, the Company and Mr. Mathrani entered into the 2015 Employment Agreement for a five‑year term commencing on January 1, 2015. The term of the 2015 Employment Agreement automatically renews for additional one‑year periods thereafter unless either party provides notice of non-renewal at least 90 days prior to the end of the initial term or renewal term, as applicable. The Company agreed, pursuant to the 2015 Employment Agreement, to continue to nominate Mr. Mathrani to the Company’s Board of Directors for so long as Mr. Mathrani serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The 2015 Employment Agreement further provides for an annual base salary of $1,200,000 and a target annual cash award of $3,000,000, including a guaranteed minimum annual cash award of $2,000,000 for the 2015 and 2016 calendar years. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the 2015 Employment Agreement, the Company granted to Mr. Mathrani an award in an amount valued on the date of grant at $25,000,000, in the form of restricted shares of Common Stock or FV LTIP units, at the election of Mr. Mathrani, which vests in full on the fifth anniversary of the Commencement Date. Mr. Mathrani elected to receive FV LTIP units. The FV LTIP units were awarded pursuant and subject to the terms and conditions of the Equity Plan. If the Company terminates Mr. Mathrani’s employment without “cause” or does not renew the 2015 Employment Agreement following the initial term, or if Mr. Mathrani terminates his employment for “good reason,” (as each such terms are defined in the 2015 Employment Agreement), then Mr. Mathrani is eligible to receive two years of salary continuation, two times his annual cash award for the previous year, a pro rata annual cash award for the year of termination (based on his annual cash award for the previous year), full vesting of the awards described above, and two years of welfare benefit continuation. If Mr. Mathrani’s employment is terminated due to death or disability, then Mr. Mathrani is eligible to receive pro rata annual cash award for the year of termination (based on his annual cash award for the previous year) and full vesting of all awards. Pursuant to the 2015 Employment Agreement, Mr. Mathrani’s annual awards commencing with the 2015 fiscal year and the FV LTIP units granted on February 12, 2015 vest upon a change of control.
Other NEOs. All of the Company’s executive officers, except for our Chief Executive Officer, Sandeep Mathrani, are “at will” employees. We have no written or oral employment agreements with these executive officers. All of the compensation arrangements we have with these executive officers are reviewed and may be modified from time to time by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors.
Although Messrs. Khan, Barocas, Berman and Pesin are at will employees, each is eligible to receive severance payments if his employment is terminated by us “without cause”. For Mr. Khan, the severance payment is equal to his annual base salary plus a pro rata annual cash award for the year of termination (based on the target cash award for the current year). For Messrs. Barocas and Pesin, the severance payment is equal to six months of the officers’ annual base salary plus a pro rata annual cash award for the year of termination (based on the target cash award for the current year). If Mr. Berman is terminated by the Company “without cause” prior to the vesting of his initial award of 400,000 stock options which occurs on December 15, 2016, Mr. Berman will be eligible to receive the following benefits: (i) a severance payment equal to two years’ base salary and two times his target cash award for the current year and (ii) 80,000 stock options of his initial award of 400,000 stock options shall vest on the termination date.


44


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The following directors served as members of the Compensation Committee during 2015: J. Bruce Flatt, Mary Lou Fiala, John K. Haley, and Daniel B. Hurwitz. No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the Company during fiscal year 2015, and no member of the Compensation Committee was formerly an officer of the Company. Other than as disclosed under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” above, with respect to Brookfield (of which Mr. Flatt is a Chief Executive Officer of Brookfield), no other member of the Compensation Committee was a party to any disclosable related party transaction involving the Company.
During fiscal year 2015, none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other company that has or had executive officers serving as members of the Board of Directors, or the Compensation Committee of the Company. Mr. Berman is a member of the Board of Directors of Brixmor Property Group Inc. ("Brixmor"), and until February 9, 2016, served on Brixmor's compensation committee. Mr. Hurwitz was appointed interim CEO of Brixmor on February 8, 2016. Effective February 9, 2016, Mr. Hurwitz resigned from the Company's Compensation Committee and Mr. Berman resigned from Brixmor's compensation committee.

45


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock and Series A preferred stock by certain persons as of March 18, 2016. In the case of persons other than our executive officers and directors, or where we have received additional information from the beneficial owner, the information presented in this table is based upon the most recent filings with the SEC. The table lists the applicable percentage ownership based on 882,873,051 shares of common stock and 25,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock outstanding as of March 18, 2016. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 18, 2016 are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of the person holding these options or warrants, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise noted, the address for each reporting person below is c/o General Growth Properties, Inc., 110 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

The table below sets forth such estimated beneficial ownership for:

each stockholder that is known to us to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock or Series A preferred stock ("Principal Stockholders");
each director and director nominee;
each NEO; and
all directors and executive officers as a group.
Name of Beneficial OwnerCommon StockSeries A Preferred Stock
Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Percent of
Class
Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Percent of
Class
Principal Stockholders:
Brookfield(1)   
389,202,508 40.0%
 
The Vanguard Group(2)   
75,736,508 8.6%
 
BlackRock Inc.(3)    
50,966,709 5.8%
 
Named Executive Officers:
Sandeep Mathrani5,286,030
(4)(5) 
*

 
Michael B. Berman711,141
(4)(5) 
*

 
Shobi Khan1,203,166
(4)(5) 
*

 
Alan J. Barocas865,417
(4)(5) 
*

 
Richard S. Pesin1,084,917
(4)(5) 
*

 
Directors:
Richard B. Clark(1)   
389,202,508
(6) 
40.0%
 
Mary Lou Fiala38,509
(7) 
*

 
J. Bruce Flatt(1)   
389,202,508
(6) 
40.0%
 
John K. Haley50,073
(5) 
*

 
Daniel B. Hurwitz27,692
(7) 
*

 
Brian W. Kingston(1)   
389,202,508
(6) 
40.0%
 
David J. Neithercut55,329
(7) 
*

 
Mark R. Patterson22,665
(5) 
*

 
All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)398,896,950
(4)(5)(7) 
40.7%4,000
(8) 
*
*Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.
(1)Based on information provided to the Company, the following Brookfield entities may be deemed to constitute a “group” within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) under the Exchange Act and Rule 13d‑5(b)(1) thereunder and each member of the “group” may be deemed to beneficially own all shares of common stock and warrants held by all members of the “group”: Brookfield Retail Holdings VII LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings II Sub II LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings

46


III Sub II LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings IV‑A Sub II LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings IV‑B Sub II LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings IV‑C Sub II LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings IV‑D Sub II LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings Warrants LLC, Brookfield Asset Management Inc., Partners Limited, Brookfield Holdings Canada Inc., Brookfield Asset Management Private Institutional Capital Adviser US, LLC, Brookfield Property Partners Limited, Brookfield Property Partners L.P., Brookfield Property L.P., Brookfield US Holdings Inc., Brookfield US Corporation, Brookfield BPY Holdings Inc., BPY Canada Subholdings 1 ULC, BPY Canada Subholdings 2 ULC, BPY Canada Subholdings 3 ULC, BPY Canada Subholdings 4 ULC, Brookfield BPY Retail Holdings I LLC, Brookfield BPY Retail Holdings II LLC, Brookfield BPY Retail Holdings III LLC, Brookfield BPY Retail Holdings Sub I LLC, BPY Retail III LLC, BPY Retail IV LLC and BW Purchaser LLC. Accordingly, each of the above Brookfield entities may be deemed to beneficially own 389,202,508 shares of the Company’s common stock (which includes 89,697,531 shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants), constituting beneficial ownership of 40.0% of the shares of the Company’s common stock. The following Brookfield entities beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock in the following amounts: (i) Brookfield Retail Holdings VII LLC beneficially owns 79,094,965 shares of the Company’s common stock, constituting beneficial ownership of 9.0% of the shares of the Company’s common stock, (ii) Brookfield BPY Retail Holdings Sub I LLC beneficially owns 79,962,716 shares of the Company’s common stock (which includes 26,962,304 shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants), constituting beneficial ownership of 8.8% of the shares of the Company’s common stock, and (iii) BPY Retail IV LLC beneficially owns 61,444,210 shares of the Company’s common stock, constituting beneficial ownership of 7.0% of the shares of the Company’s common stock. By virtue of the various agreements and arrangements among the Brookfield entities, Future Fund Board of Guardians and/or Revere Holdings Limited may be deemed to be members of a “group” with certain Brookfield entities. Each of Brookfield Retail Holdings VII LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings II Sub II LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings III Sub II LLC, and Brookfield Retail Holdings IV‑A Sub II LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings IV‑B Sub II LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings IV‑C Sub II LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings IV‑D Sub II LLC, Brookfield Retail Holdings Warrants LLC (collectively, the “Investment Vehicles”) expressly disclaims, to the extent permitted by applicable law, (a) beneficial ownership of any shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants beneficially owned by each of the other Investment Vehicles and (b) beneficial ownership of any shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned by BW Purchaser LLC and/or Revere Holdings Limited. The address of each such Brookfield managed entity is c/o Brookfield Retail Holdings VII LLC, 4 Brookfield Place, 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281‑1021.

(2)Based solely on information provided by The Vanguard Group in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016. The Vanguard Group has the sole power to vote 1,834,273 shares of common stock and dispose of 74,164,354 shares of common stock. The address for this reporting person is 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355.

(3)Based solely on information provided by BlackRock Inc. in a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 26, 2016. BlackRock Inc. has the sole power to vote 46,207,996 shares of common stock and dispose of 50,966,709 shares of common stock. The address for this reporting person is 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055.

(4)Includes shares of our common stock that such person has a right to acquire within 60 days after March 18, 2016 pursuant to stock options granted under our incentive plans. These amounts are as follows: Mr. Mathrani, 4,545,882 shares; Mr. Berman, 664,210 shares; Mr. Khan, 1,176,842 shares; Mr. Barocas, 859,473 shares; Mr. Pesin, 1,059,473 shares; and all other executive officers, 341,977 shares.

(5)Does not include LTIP units, which can be settled in common stock only at the Company's discretion. Holders of LTIP units are not entitled to vote such units on any matters presented at the 2016 annual meeting. The number of FV LTIP units held by each individual is as follows: Mr. Mathrani, 1,450,549 units; Mr. Berman, 161,866 units; Mr. Khan, 168,437 units; Mr. Barocas, 113,306 units; Mr. Pesin, 113,306 units; Mr. Haley, 13,741 units; Mr. Patterson, 9,161 units; and Mr. Levine, 42,085 units. The number of AO LTIPs held by each individual is as follows: Mr. Mathrani, 826,848 units; Mr. Berman, 243,191 units; Mr. Khan, 291,829 units; Mr. Barocas, 170,233 units; Mr. Pesin, 170,233 units; and Mr. Levine, 63,230 units.  LTIP units are subject to vesting and other terms as described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

(6)Includes shares of common stock and warrants held by the Brookfield entities. J. Bruce Flatt, a director and Chairman of the Board of the Company, is the CEO and a Senior Managing Partner of Brookfield. Richard B. Clark, a director of the Company, is a Senior Managing Partner of Brookfield, as well as the Chairman of Brookfield Property Group. Brian Kingston, a director of the Company, is a Senior Managing Partner of Brookfield and the Chief Executive Officer

47


of Brookfield Property Group. Messrs. Flatt, Clark and/or Kingston may be deemed to share dispositive power over shares of common stock and warrants of the Company held by Brookfield entities. To the extent that any of Messrs. Flatt, Clark or Kingston is deemed to be the beneficial owner of any such securities of the Company beneficially owned by the Brookfield entities, BW Purchaser LLC and/or Revere Holdings Limited, such person disclaims beneficially ownership of such securities.

(7)Includes shares of unvested restricted stock. The number of shares of unvested restricted stock for each individual is as follows: Ms. Fiala, 4,992 shares; Mr. Hurwitz, 7,488 shares; Mr. Neithercut, 7,488 shares; and Ms. Marszewski, 7,526.

(8)Includes 4,000 shares of Series A preferred stock held by Mr. Levine.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file reports with the SEC regarding their ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock. Based solely on our review of the reports furnished to us, we believe that all of our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during fiscal 2015.


48


PROPOSAL 3
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote
FOR this proposal (Item 3 on the Proxy Card).

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. The Board has ratified this selection. Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, also served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 through 2015. We are submitting the selection of independent registered public accounting firm for stockholder ratification at the Annual Meeting. While the Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, termination and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee and the Board are requesting that the stockholders ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Although ratification by stockholders is not required by our organizational documents or other applicable law, the Audit Committee has determined that a policy of requesting ratification by stockholders of its selection of an independent registered public accounting firm is a matter of good corporate practice. If stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee may reconsider the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire.

Auditor Fees and Services

The following table presents the fees paid by the Company to its independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, for the audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP and its affiliates for those periods.
Audit fees consisted principally of the audits of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements, internal control over financial reporting, reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q, comfort letters, and reviews of other filings or registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The 2015, 2014 and 2013 audit‑related fees consisted primarily of various audits of individual or portfolios of properties to comply with lender, joint venture partner or tenant requirements. The 2015, 2014 and 2013 audit fees exclude $60,000 $27,000 and $59,000, respectively, related to consents provided for the 2014, 2013 and 2012 consolidated financial statements of the Company included in registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933 of Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (“BPY”); such fees were reimbursed by BPY. The 2013 fees also exclude $75,000 related to consents and comfort letters provided for the 2012 consolidated financial statements of the Company included in registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933 related to the sale of shares held by affiliates of the Blackstone Group (“Blackstone”); such fees were reimbursed by Blackstone. Tax services consisted principally of services necessitated by the Company’s ongoing tax compliance requirements.
 201520142013
Audit Fees
$3,034,000

$3,003,000
$2,846,000
Audit-Related Fees
$983,000

$836,000

$711,000
Tax Fees
$625,000

$794,000

$866,000
All Other Fees




49


Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee charter requires the Audit Committee to pre‑approve all auditing services and permitted non‑audit services (including the fees and terms associated with such services) to be provided by the Company’s independent auditor, subject to certain de minimis exceptions for non‑audit services which are approved by the Audit Committee prior to the completion of the audit. Pre‑approval is typically provided at regularly scheduled Audit Committee meetings, but the Audit Committee has delegated to its Chair the authority to grant pre‑approval for specified matters between meetings as necessary, provided the matter is then presented to the full Audit Committee at the next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee has granted pre‑approval for routine and recurring audit, non‑audit and tax services, in each case with fees less than $50,000. Under the policies adopted by the Audit Committee, if the invoice for a previously approved service materially exceeds the estimated fee or range of fees, the Audit Committee or its Chair must approve such excess amount prior to payment of the invoice; the Company’s independent auditors have been informed of this policy.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accountants the matters required to be discussed under applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) standards.

The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accountants required by the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accountants the issue of their independence.

Based on its review of the audited financial statements and the various discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 for filing with the SEC.


John K. Haley (Chair)
David J. Neithercut
Mark R. Patterson


50


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Stockholder Communications with the Board

Stockholders or other interested persons wishing to communicate with members of the Board may contact them by writing to them, c/o Corporate Secretary, at our principal executive offices at 110 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606.250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10281-1023. Correspondence may be addressed to the independent directors as a group, the entire Board or one or more individual members of the Board, at the election of the sender. Any such communication will be promptly distributed to the director or directors named therein. Communications will be forwarded to all directors if they relate to substantive matters and include suggestions or comments that the recipient considers to be important for all directors to know.


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our Service Providers, wholly-owned subsidiaries of Brookfield Asset Management, provide management services to us pursuant to our Master Services Agreement. Brian W. Kingston and Bryan K. Davis in their roles at the Service Providers perform similar functions for BPYU as would typically be performed by a principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively.

Set forth below is the biographical information for each of Messrs. Kingston and Davis.

Brian W. Kingston, 46

Mr. Kingston is Chief Executive Officer of BPG. He is also a Managing Partner of Brookfield Asset Management, which he joined in 2001. From 2008 to 2013, Mr. Kingston led Brookfield Asset Management’s Australian business activities, holding the positions of Chief Executive Officer of Brookfield Office Properties Australia, Chief Executive Officer of Prime Infrastructure and Chief Financial Officer of Multiplex. Mr. Kingston served as a director on the GGP Board of Directors from August 2013 until his resignation in August 2018 in connection with the acquisition of GGP and previously served on the board of Rouse Properties, Inc. from 2013 to 2016.

Brian K. Davis, 46

Mr. Davis is Chief Financial Officer of BPG. Prior to that, he was Chief Financial Officer of Brookfield Asset Management’s global office property company for eight years and spent five years in senior finance roles. Mr. Davis also held various senior finance positions including Chief Financial Officer of Trilon Financial Corporation, Brookfield Asset Management’s financial services subsidiary. Mr. Davis serves on the board of Brookfield Office Properties Inc. Prior to joining Brookfield Asset Management in 1999, Mr. Davis was involved in providing restructuring and advisory services at Deloitte.

Compensation of Executive Officers

The Company does not directly employ any of the persons responsible for managing its business. Under our Master Services Agreement, our Service Providers provide, or arrange for other service providers to provide, day-to-day management and administrative services for our Company. Please see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Master Services Agreement” below for further detail on our Master Services Agreement.

Messrs. Kingston and Davis in their roles at the Service Providers perform similar functions for BPYU as would typically be performed by a principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively. BPYU does not directly or indirectly compensate Messrs. Kingston and Davis or grant them any equity awards. BPYU does not reimburse the Service Providers for their compensation. The compensation of Messrs. Kingston and Davis is set by the Service Providers and we have no control over the determination of their compensation. Messrs. Kingston and Davis participate in employee benefit plans and arrangements sponsored by the Service Providers. We have not established any employee benefit plans or entered into any employment agreements with them.

Given that the Company is externally managed and does not compensate employees of the Service Providers or reimburse the Service Providers for their compensation, the Board has determined to no longer hold annual stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation.

16 

Electronic Access

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Directors receive an annual retainer of $15,000 for their service on the Board and reimbursement of expenses incurred in attending meetings. Directors also receive an annual retainer of $125,000 for serving on the board of directors and various committees of the BPY General Partner. The BPY General Partner pays the chair of its audit committee an additional $20,000 per year and pays the other members of its audit committee an additional $10,000 per year for serving in such positions. The BPY General Partner also pays its lead independent director an additional $10,000 per year. Directors who are not independent due to Proxy Materialstheir employment with Brookfield Asset Management receive no fees for their services on the Board.

The Governance and DirectionsNominating Committee periodically reviews Board compensation in relation to its peers and other similarly sized companies and is responsible for approving changes in compensation for non-employee directors.

2019 Director Compensation

The following table sets forth the compensation earned by or paid to each of our non-employee directors in 2019. Mr. McGregor was appointed to the Board in March 2020 and, therefore, did not receive any compensation during 2019.

Name Fees Earned
or
Paid in
Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards ($)(1)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
Richard B. Clark            
Caroline M. Atkinson  15,000         15,000 
Jeffrey M. Blidner            
Soon Young Chang  15,000         15,000 
Scott R. Cutler  15,000         15,000 
Omar Carneiro da Cunha  15,000         15,000 
Stephen DeNardo  15,000         15,000 
Louis J. Maroun  15,000         15,000 
Lars Rodert  15,000         15,000 

(1)None of the directors held BPYU stock options or unvested stock awards as of December 31, 2019.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of each class of our capital stock by certain persons as of March 31, 2020. In the case of persons other than Messrs. Kingston and Davis, our directors and Brookfield Asset Management, or where we have received additional information from the beneficial owner, the information presented in this table is based upon the most recent filings with the SEC.

The table lists the applicable percentage ownership based on 57,336,992 shares of Class A Stock, 202,438,184 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, 175,180,348 shares of Class B-1 Stock, 121,203,654 shares of Class B-2 stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class B-2 Stock”), 640,051,301 shares of Class C Stock and 10,000,000 shares of 6.375% Series A Cumulative Perpetual Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”) outstanding as of March 31, 2019.

The table below sets forth such estimated beneficial ownership for: each stockholder that is known to us to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of each class of our capital stock (“Principal Stockholders”); each director; Messrs. Kingston and Davis; and all directors and Messrs. Kingston and Davis as a group.

  Class A Stock  Series B Preferred Stock  Class B-1 Stock  Class B-2 Stock  Class C Stock  Series A Preferred Stock 
Name of Beneficial Owner # Shares Beneficially Owned  % of
Class
  # Shares Beneficially Owned  % of
Class
  # Shares Beneficially Owned  % of
Class
  # Shares Beneficially Owned  % of
Class
  # Shares Beneficially Owned  % of
Class
  # Shares Beneficially Owned  % of
Class
 
Principal Stockholders:
Blackrock, Inc.(1)  4,193,676   7.31%                              
BPY        202,438,184   100%  175,180,348   100%  121,203,654   100%  640,051,301   100%      
Persons and entities associated with Farallon Capital Management LLC(2)  8,054,215   14.04%                              
The Vanguard Group(3)  5,028,678   8.77%                              
Persons associated with FMR LLC(4)  4,000,887   6.98%                              
Named Executive Officers(5):
Brian W. Kingston  235,000   *                               
Bryan K. Davis  100,000   *                               
Directors(5):
Caroline M. Atkinson                                    
Jeffrey M. Blidner                                    
Soon Young Chang                                    
Richard B. Clark  222,154   *                               
Omar Carneiro da Cunha                                    
Scott R. Cutler  6,665   *                               
Stephen DeNardo                                    
Louis J. Maroun                                    
A. Douglas McGregor                                    
Lars Rodert                                    
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)  563,819   *                               

*Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.

(1)Information regarding BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock with the SEC on July 10, 2019. BlackRock’s address is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that BlackRock has sole voting power with respect to 3,827,792 shares of Class A Stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 4,193,676 shares of Class A Stock.

(2)Information regarding Farallon Capital Management, LLC (“Farallon”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by Farallon with the SEC on September 7, 2018 on behalf of Farallon and the following associated persons and entities: Farallon Capital Partners, L.P., Farallon Capital Institutional Partners, L.P., Farallon Capital Institutional Partners II, L.P., Farallon Capital Institutional Partners III, L.P., Four Crossings Institutional Partners V, L.P. and Farallon Capital (AM) Investors L.P., Farallon Partners, L.L.C., Farallon Institutional (GP) V, L.L.C., Philip D. Dreyfuss, Michael B. Fisch, Richard B. Fried, David T. Kim, Monica R. Landry, Michael G. Linn, Rajiv A. Patel, Thomas G. Roberts, Jr., William Seybold, Andrew J. M. Spokes, John R. Warren and Mark C. Wehrly (collectively, the “Farallon Reporting Persons”). The address of the Farallon Reporting Persons is c/o Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2100, San Francisco, CA 94111. The Schedule 13G indicates that, collectively, the Farallon Reporting Persons have shared voting and dispositive power over 8,054,215 shares of Class A Stock.


(3)Information regarding The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Vanguard with the SEC on February 12, 2020. Vanguard’s address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that Vanguard has sole voting power with respect to 85,151 shares of Class A Stock, shared voting power with respect to 64,176 shares of Class A Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,949,787 shares of Class A Stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 78,891 shares of Class A Stock.

(4)Information regarding FMR LLC is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by FMR LLC with the SEC on February 7, 2020 on behalf of FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson (collectively, the FMR Reporting Persons”). The address of the FMR Reporting Persons is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210. The Schedule 13G indicates that the FMR Reporting Persons have sole voting power with respect to 876 shares of Class A Stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 4,000,887 shares of Class A Stock.

(5)Unless otherwise noted, the address of (i) Mr. Blidner is c/o Brookfield Asset Management, 181 Bay Street, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2T3; (ii) Ms. Atkinson and Messrs. Carneiro da Cunha, Chang, Cutler, DeNardo, Maroun, McGregor and Rodert, is c/o Brookfield Property Partners Limited, 73 Front Street, 5th Floor, Hamilton, HM 12 Bermuda; and (iii) Messrs. Clark, Kingston and Davis is c/o Brookfield Property Group, Brookfield Place, 250 Vesey Street, 15th Floor, New York, NY 10281.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Conflicts Policy

Our Governance and Nominating Committee has approved a Conflicts Policy designed to assist with the proper identification, review and disclosure of related party transactions. The Conflicts Policy addresses the approval and other requirements for transactions in which there is greater potential for a conflict of interest to arise. These transactions include:

acquisitions by us from, and dispositions by us to, Brookfield Asset Management and its affiliates;

the dissolution of the Company or its operating partnership;

any material amendment to our Master Services Agreement;

any material service agreement or other material arrangement pursuant to which Brookfield Asset Management or its affiliates will be paid a fee, or other consideration other than any agreement or arrangement contemplated by our Master Services Agreement;

termination of, or any determinations regarding indemnification under, our Master Services Agreement; and

any other material transaction involving us and Brookfield Asset Management and its affiliates.

Our Conflicts Policy requires the transactions described above to be approved by our Governance and Nominating Committee. Pursuant to our Conflicts Policy, the Governance and Nominating Committee may grant approvals for any of the transactions described above in the form of general guidelines, policies or procedures in which case no further special approval will be required in connection with a particular transaction or matter permitted thereby. The Conflicts Policy can be amended at the discretion of the Governance and Nominating Committee.

Related Party Transactions

Master Services Agreement

We have entered into a Master Services Agreement pursuant to which the Service Providers, wholly owned subsidiaries of Brookfield Asset Management, have agreed to provide or arrange for other Service Providers to provide management and administration services to our Company and its subsidiaries. The following is a summary of certain provisions of our Master Services Agreement. Because this description is only a summary of our Master Services Agreement, it does not necessarily contain all of the information that you may find useful. We therefore urge you to review our Master Services Agreement in its entirety. Our Master Services Agreement is available electronically on the website of the SEC at www.sec.gov and a copy may be obtained by writing to our Secretary at our principal executive offices.

Under our Master Services Agreement, we have appointed the Service Providers to provide or arrange for the provision of the following services:

supervising the carrying out of all day-to-day management, secretarial, accounting, banking, treasury, administrative, liaison, representative, regulatory and reporting functions and obligations;

providing overall strategic advice, including advising with respect to the expansion into new markets;

supervising the establishment and maintenance of books and records;

identifying and recommending acquisitions or dispositions from time to time and, where requested to do so, assisting in negotiating the terms of such acquisitions or dispositions;

recommending and, where requested to do so, assisting in the raising of funds whether by way of debt, equity or otherwise;

recommending suitable candidates to serve on the boards of directors or the equivalent governing bodies of us and our operating entities;


Whether youmaking recommendations with respect to the exercise of any voting rights to which we are entitled in respect of our operating entities;

making recommendations with respect to the payment of dividends or any other distributions, including distributions by our Company to our unitholders;

monitoring and/or oversight of accountants, legal counsel and other accounting, financial or legal advisors and technical, commercial, marketing and other independent experts, and managing litigation;

attending to all matters necessary for any reorganization, bankruptcy proceedings, dissolution or winding up, subject to approval by the relevant board of directors or its equivalent;

supervising the making of all tax elections, determinations and designations, the timely calculation and payment of taxes payable and the filing of all tax returns;

supervising the preparation of the annual consolidated financial statements, quarterly interim financial statements and other public disclosure;

making recommendations in relation to and effecting the entry into insurance arrangements;

arranging for individuals to carry out the functions of principal executive, accounting and financial officers for our Company only for purposes of applicable securities laws;

providing individuals to act as senior officers, subject to the approval of the relevant board of directors or its equivalent;

providing advice, when requested, regarding the maintenance of compliance with applicable laws and other obligations; and

providing all such other services as may from time to time be agreed that are reasonably related to day-to-day operations.

The Service Providers’ activities are subject to the supervision of the board of directors or equivalent governing body of BPYU and of each of the other Service Recipients, as applicable. The relevant governing body remains responsible for all investment and divestment decisions made by the Service Recipient.

Pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, BPYU pays an annual base management fee to the Service Providers equal to 1.25% of the total capitalization of BPYU, subject to certain adjustments. The total capitalization value of BPYU is equal to the aggregate of the value of all of the outstanding Class A Stock and other securities of BPYU and its direct or indirect subsidiaries that are not held by BPYU, BPY and certain of their affiliates, plus all outstanding third party debt with recourse against BPYU and any other direct or indirect subsidiary, less all cash held by such entities. For the first 12 months following the closing of the BPY Transaction, Brookfield Asset Management agreed to waive management fees payable by BPYU and the incremental management fees BPY would otherwise be required to pay in respect of the securities issued in exchange for the GGP common stock in the BPY Transaction. For the year ended December 31, 2019, $2.1 million was paid under the Master Services Agreement.

For any quarter in which the Board determines that there is insufficient available cash to pay the base management fee as well as the next regular distribution on Class A Stock, BPYU may elect to pay all or a portion of the base management fee in Class A Stock, subject to certain conditions. The base management fee is calculated and paid on a quarterly basis.

To the extent that under any other arrangement BPYU or its subsidiaries makes a payment that is determined to be comparable to the base management fee payable by BPYU, the base management fee payable by BPYU will be reduced on a dollar for dollar basis by the comparable base management fee, subject to certain limitations. In addition, to the extent that there are any residual fees, comparable to the base management fees payable by BPYU, that are not used to reduce the base management fees payable by BPY, the base management fee payable by BPYU will be reduced on a dollar for dollar basis by such residual fees.


Additionally, the Service Providers are reimbursed for any out-of-pocket fees, costs and expenses incurred in the provision of the management and administration services, including those of any third party. However, BPYU is not required to reimburse the Service Providers for the salaries and other remuneration of their management, personnel or support staff who carry out any services or functions for BPYU or overhead for such persons.

Incentive Distributions

An affiliate of Brookfield Asset Management is entitled to receive incentive distributions based on an amount by which quarterly distributions on the Class A Stock and series K preferred units of BPYU’s operating partnership exceed specified target levels. No incentive distributions were paid in the year ended December 31, 2019.

Financings

From time to time, Brookfield may loan funds to us or place funds on deposit with us, on terms approved by our Governance and Nominating Committee. The following arrangements were entered into during the year ended December 31, 2019:

On January 30, 2019, we entered into a revolving credit facility with BPY Bermuda Holdings IV Limited, a subsidiary of BPY, in which we lent $330.0 million. The note had an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.50% and was scheduled to mature on January 30, 2020. On March 25, 2019, the note was repaid in full.

On March 25, 2019, the Company issued a $341.8 million subordinated unsecured note to Brookfield BPY Holdings Inc., a subsidiary of BPY. The note bears interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 2.75% and is scheduled to mature on March 25, 2029. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company repaid this loan in full.

The Company received an additional $70.5 million loan from Brookfield BPY Holdings Inc. during the second quarter of 2019, with a maturity date of June 25, 2029. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company made principal payments totaling $68.0 million resulting in a remaining balance at December 31, 2019 of $2.5 million.

The Company borrowed an additional $31.7 million from Brookfield BPY Holdings Inc. on December 20, 2019 which was due on January 6, 2020 and has since been repaid.

Other Services

Brookfield Asset Management and its affiliates may provide services to our subsidiaries which are outside the scope of our Master Services Agreement under arrangements that are on market terms and conditions, or otherwise permitted or approved by independent directors, pursuant to our Conflicts Policy, and pursuant to which Brookfield Asset Management will receive fees. The services that may be provided under these arrangements include financial advisory, property management, facilities management, development, relocation services, construction activities, marketing or other services. We may also provide similar services to Brookfield Asset Management and its affiliates that are on market terms and conditions, or otherwise permitted or approved by independent directors, pursuant to our Conflicts Policy, and pursuant to which we will receive fees. We paid or received the Noticefollowing fees for such services in the year ended December 31, 2019:

Amounts received from Brookfield Asset Management and its subsidiaries for property management, leasing, tenant coordination, construction management, development management and marketing services – $2.6 million; and

Amounts paid to Brookfield Asset Management and its subsidiaries for construction costs of Internet Availabilitydevelopment properties –$1.3 million.

Other Related Party Transactions

In connection with the BPY Transaction, Brookfield Asset Management entered into a rights agreement with Wilmington Trust Company whereby it agreed to satisfy, or cause to be satisfied, the obligations with respect to the secondary exchange rights contained in the Company’s Charter and deposit certain cash or securities in a collateral account in accordance with the agreement. In this agreement, Brookfield Asset Management was granted a consent right whereby prior to the issuance by BPYU of any shares of Class A Stock, BPYU will be required, for as long as Brookfield Asset Management is a party to the rights agreement, to obtain the consent of Brookfield Asset Management. The rights agreement will terminate on the earlier of the twentieth anniversary of the BPY Transaction or if there is no Class A Stock outstanding, other than Class A Stock owned by Brookfield Asset Management and its affiliates. Our Company is required to reimburse Brookfield Asset Management for all amounts paid to the rights agent (i) pursuant to the rights agreement including, in respect of services rendered, out-of-pocket expenses, counsel fees and other disbursements incurred in the administration and execution of the agreement and the exercise and performance of the rights agent’s duties thereunder, and (ii) in respect of any indemnification provided to the rights agent pursuant to the rights agreement.


BPYU, BPY and the BPY General Partner, among others, are party to the Joint Governance Agreement which provides a subsidiary of BPY with the right to designate candidates to be nominated for election to the Board. See “Corporate Governance—Director Nomination Process” for further detail on this agreement.

On August 19, 2019, the Company sold the SoNo Collection to a newly formed joint venture owned 80.5% by an affiliated fund (which is a related party of the Company) and 19.5% by the Company. The property was contributed to the joint venture at a value of $419.3 million based on project-specific cash costs. This excludes additional costs to complete the project by the joint venture. On December 4, 2019, the joint venture partner contributed $30.0 million and committed to contribute an additional $70.8 million in additional capital to the joint venture, resulting in a dilution of the Company's ownership interest from 19.5% to 12.9% as of December 31, 2019. The $70.8 million contribution was received on February 7, 2020.


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements appearing in the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accountants the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards and the SEC.

The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accountants required by the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accountants the issue of their independence.

Based on its review of the audited financial statements and the various discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 for filing with the SEC.

Stephen DeNardo (Chair)

Louis J. Maroun

Lars Rodert


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Delinquent Section 16 Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports with the SEC regarding their ownership and changes in ownership of such registered equity securities. Based on our review of the copies of all Section 16(a) forms received by us and other information, we believe that with regard to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, all of our executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders complied with all applicable filing requirements, except as follows: Caroline M. Atkinson and Scott R. Cutler were late in filing their initial Form 3 filings upon their respective appointments to the Board in February 2019 and A. Douglas McGregor was late in filing his initial Form 3 upon appointment to the Board in March 2020.

Householding of Proxy Materials or paper copies

We have adopted a procedure called “householding”, which the SEC has approved. Under this procedure, we are delivering a single copy of proxy materials, the Company’s proxy materials, includingNotice and, if requested, this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report are available for you to review online. To request a paper copy of proxy materials, please call 1‑800‑579‑1639, or you may request a paper copy by email at sendmaterial@proxyvote.com, or by logging onto www.proxyvote.com.

For directions to the Annual Meeting site, please visit our website at: www.ggp.com.
Householding of Proxy Materials
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or moremultiple stockholders sharingwho share the same address, by delivering a single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (or proxy materials in the case of stockholders who receive paper copies of proxy materials), addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.
A number of banks and brokers with account holders who are beneficial holders of the Company’s common stock will be householding the Company’s Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (or proxy materials in the case of stockholders who receive paper copies of proxy materials). If youunless we have received noticecontrary instructions from your bank or broker that it will be householding communications to your address,a stockholder. This procedure reduces our printing and mailing costs and other fees. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue until you are notified otherwiseto be able to request and receive separate proxy cards. Additionally, upon written or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (or proxy materials, if applicable), please notify your bank or broker, or contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., toll‑free at 1‑800‑542‑1061 or by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Attn: Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. The Company undertakes, upon oral or written request, towe will deliver promptly a separate copy of the Company’s Notice, of Internet Availability ofthis Proxy Materials (or proxy materials, if applicable)Statement or the Annual Report to aany stockholder at a shared address to which we have delivered a single copy of these documents. To receive a separate copy of the Notice, this Proxy Statement or the Annual Report, or to notify us that you wish to receive separate copies of our proxy materials for future annual meetings of our stockholders, write to the attention of Investor Relations at the address of our principal executive offices or contact us at bpy.enquiries@brookfield.com. Stockholders who share an address and are receiving multiple copies of our proxy materials may also request to receive a single copy of the document was delivered. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the Notice, of Internet Availability ofthis Proxy Materials (or proxy materials, if applicable) at their addressStatement and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their bank or broker or Investor Relations at the contact address and telephone number for the Company provided above.
The Annual Report
The Company’s Annual Report for fiscal year 2015 is available for viewing on the Company’s website www.ggp.com under “Investors—Financial Information.” Please read it carefully.
Annual Report on Form 10‑K
The Company filed with the SEC an Annual Report on Form 10‑K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. Stockholders may obtain a copy, without charge, by visiting the Company’s website at www.ggp.com.
The Company will provide a copy of the fiscal year 2015 Annual Report on Form 10‑K, including the financial statements and financial schedule, upon written request to the Corporate Secretary, at our principal executive offices at 110 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606. Additionally, we will provide copies of the exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10‑K upon paymentor our proxy materials for future annual meetings of a reasonable fee (which will be limited to our reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibits).

51


stockholders by writing or calling us as indicated above.

Stockholder Proposals and Nomination of Directors at the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

If a stockholder intends to present any proposal for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement in accordance with Rule 14a‑814a-8 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 14a‑8”14a-8”), it must be received at our principal executive offices no later than December 3, 2016.31, 2020. This notice must be in writing, must include any additional information and materials required by our bylaws, and must comply with the other provisions of Rule 14a‑8.

14a-8.

Under our Amended and Restated Bylaws, (“Bylaws”), nominations for director and any other business proposal may be made by a stockholder entitled to vote at the 20172021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders who delivers written notice, along with the additional information and materials required by our Bylaws, to our Corporate Secretary not later than 90 days nor earlier than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of this year’s annual meeting. As specified in the Bylaws, different notice deadlines apply in the case of a special meeting, when the date of an annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after the first anniversary of the prior year’s meeting, or when the first public announcement of the date of an annual meeting is less than 100 days prior to the date of such annual meeting. Accordingly, for our annual meeting in the year 2017,2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we must receive this notice on or after JanuaryFebruary 17, 2017,2021, and on or before February 16, 2017.March 19, 2021. You may obtain a copy of our Bylaws by writing to our Corporate Secretary.Secretary at our principal executive offices. A matter submitted to us in accordance with our Bylaws may be presented at next year’s annual meeting, but we are not required to include any such matter in our proxy statement unless the submission also complies with Rule 14a‑8.14a-8. However, the persons named in the proxy for next year’s annual meeting will not have discretionary authority to vote with respect to the matter submitted unless we state in the proxy statement the nature of the matter and how the persons named in the proxy intend to vote with respect to the matter. Any matter which is not timely submitted to us in accordance with the requirements of our Bylaws may not be acted upon at the meeting.


52


ABOUT THE MEETING


Why am I receiving these materials?

We are making these materials available to you on the Internet or, upon your request, delivering printed versions of these materials to you by mail, in connection with our Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. These materials include:
Our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting; and
Our 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our audited consolidated financial statements.

If you requested printed versions of these materials by mail, these materials also include the proxy card and an admission ticket for the Annual Meeting.
What is a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, and can I obtain a printed copy of the proxy materials?
In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, on or about April 1, 2016, we are mailing to our record and beneficial stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), which contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet and vote online. If you received the Notice, you will not receive a printed copy of our proxy materials by mail unless you request one not later than May 3, 2016. If you wish to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, you should follow the instructions included in the Notice for requesting those materials.
What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?
At our Annual Meeting, our stockholders will vote upon the matters outlined in the accompanying notice of meeting, including:
The election of nine directors to serve until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified (see page 1);

Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the named executive officers (see page 18); and

The ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016 (see page 49).

Management will report on GGP’s performance during 2015 and respond to appropriate questions from stockholders. In addition, representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions.
Who is entitled to vote?
The Board has fixed the close of business (Eastern Time) on March 18, 2016, as the record date to determine who is entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. There were 882,873,051 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding on the record date, each entitled to one vote on each proposal to be voted on. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any and all adjournments or postponements thereof.
What do I need to attend the Annual Meeting?
Only GGP stockholders may attend the Annual Meeting. You will need an admission ticket or other proof of stock ownership to be admitted to the meeting. If you hold shares directly in your name as a stockholder of record and have received a printed copy of our proxy materials, an admission ticket is attached to your printed proxy card. If you plan to attend the meeting, please vote your proxy but retain the admission ticket and bring it with you to the meeting. If you have not received a printed copy of our proxy materials, please request an admission ticket by writing to us at: General Growth Properties, Inc., 110 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606-1511, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

53


If your shares are held beneficially in the name of a broker or other nominee, you may obtain admission to the meeting by presenting proof of your ownership of our common stock. For example, you may bring your account statement or a letter from your bank or broker confirming that you owned GGP stock on March 18, 2016, the record date for the meeting. To be able to vote at the meeting, you will need the bank, broker or record holder to give you a proxy.
All stockholders must also present a form of photo identification, such as a valid driver’s license or passport, in order to be admitted to the meeting.
No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags or packages will be permitted at the meeting.
What are the Board’s voting recommendations?
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares FOR the election of each of the nominees to the Board (Proposal 1), FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the named executive officers (Proposal 2), and FOR ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3).
What happens if additional proposals are presented at the meeting?
Other than the matters described in this Proxy Statement, we do not expect any additional matters to be presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting. If other matters are presented by or at the direction of the Board as permitted by our Bylaws and you vote by proxy, your proxy grants the individuals named as proxy holders the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting.
How do I vote my shares?
If you are a “record” holder of our common stock (that is, if you hold your stock in your own name in the Company’s stock records maintained by our transfer agent), you may vote over the Internet by following the instructions included in the Notice, or, if you received a printed copy of our proxy materials, you can also vote by mail or telephone. Internet and telephone voting will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the day before the meeting date. Please see the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card for more information.
If you sign and return a proxy for your shares, it will be voted as you direct and, if you do not provide direction on a matter to be voted on, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. You may also vote your shares by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person by ballot at the meeting.
If you hold shares of our common stock in “street name” (that is, through a broker, bank or other nominee), you will need to obtain a voting instruction form from the institution that holds your shares and follow the voting instructions on that form. It is important that you provide the broker, bank or other nominee who holds your shares with voting instructions on the matters to be voted on at the meeting. With respect to Proposal 1 (the election of directors) and Proposal 2 (the approval, on an advisory basis, of compensation paid to named executive officers), your broker or other institution generally will not be able to vote your shares unless you provide voting instructions. With respect to Proposal 3 (the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm), your broker or other nominee in certain circumstances may be able to vote your shares in its discretion without voting instructions from you.
Can I change my vote?
If you are a “record” holder, you may revoke a previously submitted proxy and change your vote by:
Voting again over the Internet or by telephone by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the day before the meeting date (only the latest Internet or telephone proxy will be counted);

Properly executing and delivering a later‑dated proxy card (your proxy must be received by the close of business (Eastern Time) on the day before the meeting date);

Voting by ballot at the Annual Meeting; or


54


Sending a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, 110 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606 (your notice must be received by the close of business (Eastern Time) on the day before the meeting date).

If you hold shares of our common stock in “street name,” you will need to contact the institution that holds your shares and follow its instructions for revoking a proxy.
Who will bear the costs of soliciting votes for the meeting?
Your proxy is being solicited by the Board on behalf of the Company. GGP will bear the entire cost of the solicitation of proxies from its stockholders. In addition to sending stockholders these proxy materials, the solicitation of proxies or votes may be made in person, by telephone or by electronic communication by our directors, officers and employees, who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation activities. We will also reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to our stockholders.
What constitutes a quorum?
If a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding on the record date are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, we will have a quorum, permitting the conduct of business at the Annual Meeting. As of the record date, we had 882,873,051 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present in person or represented by proxy for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.
What is a broker non-vote?
A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that matter and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.
How are shares held by a broker or nominee voted?
Under NYSE rules, the ratification of the selection of an independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3) is considered a “routine” matter, and brokers generally may vote on behalf of beneficial owners who have not furnished voting instructions, subject to the rules of the NYSE concerning transmission of proxy materials to beneficial owners, and subject to any proxy voting policies and procedures of those brokerage firms. However, brokers may not vote on the other proposals contained in this Proxy Statement, which are considered “non-routine” proposals, unless they have received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. To the extent that they have not received voting instructions, brokers report such number of shares as “non-votes.”
How are shares held in the General Growth 401(k) Savings Plan voted?
If you hold your stock through the General Growth 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”), you have the right to instruct the trustees of the Savings Plan how to vote your shares. You can vote your shares by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card. The trustee of the Savings Plan will have the voting instructions of each participant in the Savings Plan tabulated and will vote the shares of the participants by submitting a final proxy card representing the Savings Plan’s shares for inclusion in the tally at the Annual Meeting. If you hold shares in this Savings Plan and do not vote, the Savings Plan trustee will vote your shares (along with all other shares in the Savings Plan for which instructions are not provided) in the same proportion as those shares for which instructions are received from other participants in the Savings Plan. In order for your instructions to be followed, you must provide instructions for the shares you hold through the Savings Plan by returning your completed and signed proxy card by mail to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 at least three days prior to the meeting date, or by voting over the telephone or the Internet at by 11:00am (Eastern Time) on May 13, 2016.
How will the proxy holders vote?
The Board selected the persons named in the accompanying proxy, who have advised the Company that they intend to vote the shares represented by all properly executed and unrevoked proxies received by them FOR each of the Board nominees for director and FOR Proposals 2 and 3 if no contrary instructions are given. Further, either of these named persons will vote on any other matter which may come before the Annual Meeting in accordance with their best judgment.

55


What are the voting options and what are the voting requirements for each proposal?
ProposalVoting Choices and Board RecommendationVoting Requirement
Item 1:
Election of Directors*
Ÿ Vote in favor of all nominees;
Ÿ Vote in favor of specific nominees;
Ÿ Vote against all nominees;
Ÿ Vote against specific nominees;
Ÿ Abstain from voting with respect to all nominees; or
Ÿ Abstain from voting with respect to specific nominees.

Majority of votes cast

Abstentions excluded
The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the Director Nominees.
Item 2:
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
Ÿ Vote in favor of the advisory proposal;
Ÿ Vote against the advisory proposal; or
Ÿ Abstain from voting on the advisory proposal.
Majority of votes present

Abstentions have the effect of AGAINST VOTE
The Board recommends a vote FOR the advisory vote to approve executive compensation.
Item 3:
Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Auditors
Ÿ Vote in favor of the ratification;
Ÿ Vote against the ratification; or
Ÿ Abstain from voting on the ratification.
Majority of votes present

Abstentions have the effect of AGAINST VOTE
The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification.
*Under Delaware law, if an incumbent director is not re-elected, the director will continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” If any incumbent director is not re-elected, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the director is required to tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider the resignation, evaluating the best interest of the Company and its stockholders, and make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation. Each of the nominees has consented to serve as a member of the Board of Directors if he or she is re‑elected. If any nominee is unable to serve if elected, it is intended that the proxies will be voted for the election of the other remaining nominees and may be voted for any substitute nominees of the Board. In no event will the proxies be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

NYSE rules do not allow brokers discretionary authority to vote in the election of directors (Proposal 1) or approval, on an advisory basis, of executive compensation (Proposal 2). Therefore, if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your shares will not be voted on Proposals 1 or 2. We urge you to promptly provide voting instructions to your broker to ensure that your shares are voted in these matters.

56


WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING, BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK.
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
110 N. WACKER DR.
CHICAGO, IL 60606
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS:
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by General Growth Properties, Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards, and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

VOTING INSTRUCTIONS
Your vote also constitutes voting instructions with respect to any shares held in the General Growth 401(k) Savings Plan (the "Savings Plan"). If no instructions are received by 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time on May 13, 2016, shares of stock held in the Savings Plan will be voted in the same proportion as votes received from other participants in the Savings Plan.
You can view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement on the Internet at www.proxyvote.com
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 3.
1.ELECTION OF DIRECTORSForAgainstAbstain
Nominees:ForAgainstAbstain
1a. Richard B. Clark¨¨¨
1b. Mary Lou Fiala¨¨¨2.Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the named executive officers.¨¨¨
1c. J. Bruce Flatt¨¨¨
1d. John K. Haley¨¨¨
1e. Daniel B. Hurwitz¨¨¨3.Ratification of the selection of independent registered public accounting firm.¨¨¨
1f. Brian W. Kingston¨¨¨
1g. Sandeep Mathrani¨¨¨
1h. David J. Neithercut¨¨¨In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) thereof.
1i. Mark R. Patterson¨¨¨
For address changes, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.¨
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.¨¨
YesNo
(Please date and sign this proxy exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. Joint owners should each sign personally. Trustees and others signing in a representative capacity should indicate the capacity in which they sign.)
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date



Admission TicketGeneral Growth Properties, Inc.Admission Ticket
Admission Ticket
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Date - May 17, 2016
Time - 9:00 a.m., local time
Location - 110 North Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
ADMITTANCE WILL BE DENIED WITHOUT A TICKET
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
s IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING s
GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.PROXY
This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
Sandeep Mathrani and Stacie L. Herron, and each of them, are hereby constituted and appointed the lawful attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote and act as proxy with respect to all shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, of GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC., standing in the name of the undersigned on the Company's books at the close of business on March 18, 2016, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Company's principal executive offices, 110 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois, at 9:00 a.m., local time, on May 17, 2016, or at any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) thereof, as follows:

The powers hereby granted may be exercised by any of said attorneys or proxies or their substitutes present and acting at the above-described Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) thereof, or, if only one be present and acting, then by that one. The undersigned hereby revokes any and all proxies heretofore given by the undersigned to vote at said meeting.

This proxy also serves as a voting instruction card to the Trustee of the General Growth 401(k) Savings Plan (the "Savings Plan").

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD (PROPOSAL 1), FOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (PROPOSAL 2), AND FOR RATIFICATION OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PROPOSAL 3), AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES UPON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING, AND, IN THE CASE OF SHARES HELD IN THE SAVINGS PLAN, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF SUCH SAVINGS PLAN.
Address Changes: ____________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
(If you noted any Address Changes above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)